We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading Investment Portfolio Platforms.
Breivik's financial situation according to court documents, Breivik had a net worth of approximately NOK 600,000 (approximately $54,000) at the time of his attacks. He had inherited this money from his father, who died in 2006. Breivik used some of this money to finance his attacks, including purchasing weapons and explosives. He also used some of the money to fund his far-right activities.
Terrorist Anders Behring Breivik, who is responsible for the shocking acts of violence in Norway in July 2011, had not only left a devastating impact on the nation but also had aspects of his life that were subject to scrutiny, including his investment portfolio. Breivik's investment choices were a reflection of his extremist beliefs and ideologies. While his portfolio consisted of various assets, exploring the factors and motivations behind his investments is essential. This article delves into the components of Breivik's investment portfolio, the sources of his funds, any suspicious or unusual investments, and the performance of his portfolio, shedding light on a lesser-known aspect of this infamous individual.
Anders Behring Breivik, the convicted mass murderer and terrorist responsible for the July 2011 attacks in Norway on Utoya island. His portfolio comprised investments in different financial instruments, real estate, and businesses.
Breivik's investment portfolio included a range of assets in different sectors. He held stocks in companies operating in diverse industries such as technology, energy, pharmaceuticals, etc. These stocks gave him ownership stakes in the companies and benefitted him from their financial performance and growth.
Breivik also invested in mutual funds, which are financial instruments that aggregate funds from various investors for diversified investments in a range of securities. By investing in mutual funds, he gained exposure to a broad range of assets and benefited from professional management.
Besides financial instruments, Breivik's portfolio included real estate investments. He owned properties, potentially for rental income or appreciation in value over time.
It is important to note that the specific details of Breivik's investment portfolio have yet to be widely publicized, and there may be limited information available regarding the exact composition of his holdings.
Breivik acquired the funds to build his investment portfolio through legal means and illicit activities. Before his terrorist acts, he had a background in business and claimed to have earned a significant amount of money through trading stocks and currencies. It is believed that he also received an inheritance from his deceased mother, which provided him with additional capital.
Although not extensively documented, Breivik's involvement in various business ventures may have contributed to his financial resources. However, the exact sources and amounts of his funds remain unclear.
Furthermore, Breivik engaged in fraudulent activities to finance his operations. He reportedly falsified documents and sought loans based on fraudulent premises, inflating his income and assets and enabling his investment activities.
It is important to note that Breivik's acquisition of funds and subsequent investments may have been influenced by his extremist ideologies and beliefs. His motivations for accumulating wealth were intertwined with his radical agenda, which aimed to further his political goals through violent means.
Breivik acquired the funds for his investment portfolio through various means, including trading activities, potential inheritance, and fraudulent practices. These funds were then channelled into his investments, reflecting a disturbing intersection between his financial activities and extremist mindset.
Breivik's investment portfolio primarily consisted of legal assets. He engaged in conventional investment practices, such as purchasing stocks, bonds, and mutual funds, legitimate financial instruments available in the market.
However, it is essential to distinguish between the legality of the investment assets themselves and the actions and intentions of the investor. While Breivik's assets may have been legally acquired, his extremist beliefs and subsequent acts of violence tainted the overall context of his portfolio.
The legality of the assets in Breivik's portfolio does not absolve him of his crimes or the harm he caused. His investment activities should be viewed within the broader context of his extremist ideology and the tragic consequences of his actions.
Breivik's investment portfolio primarily consisted of legal assets. However, it is essential to recognize that the legality of the assets does not diminish the gravity of his acts or the underlying extremist motivations that drove his investment choices.
While specific details about the composition of Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio are not widely available, there is no substantial evidence to suggest any suspicious or unusual investments in his portfolio. It is important to note that Breivik's investments were predominantly in mainstream financial instruments, such as stocks, bonds, and mutual funds, commonly held by investors.
However, considering Breivik's extremist ideologies and the nature of his criminal activities, his investment choices can be seen differently. The alignment between his investments and radical beliefs may be considered unusual and morally objectionable.
Despite the absence of concrete information on his portfolio, it is unlikely that Breivik's investments included overtly illicit or illegal assets. If such investments existed, they likely attracted significant attention and scrutiny from authorities during the investigation and legal proceedings.
While there is limited information about the specific investments in Breivik's portfolio, no substantial evidence suggests any suspicious or unusual assets. However, aligning his investment choices and extremist ideologies can be considered morally objectionable and uncommon in a broader societal context.
The performance of Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio regarding returns and profitability remains to be seen, as detailed financial information regarding his investments has yet to be widely disclosed. Given the limited available information, it is challenging to ascertain the specific outcomes of his portfolio.
Given the limited available information regarding Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio, it is challenging to determine specific investment strategies or preferences that he may have had. However, it is crucial to note that Breivik's investment choices should be considered within the context of his extremist ideologies and criminal actions.
While Breivik's investment strategies remain largely undisclosed, his extremist beliefs as a self-declared Christian fundamentalist and mass murderer may have influenced his investment decisions. He may have prioritized investments aligned with his ideological views or sought to support causes he deemed significant.
Moreover, Breivik's actions indicate a preference for violence and using force to advance his radical agenda. It suggests that these inclinations influenced his investment choices. However, with detailed information on his portfolio, it is easier to draw definitive conclusions about his specific investment strategies or preferences.
The specific investment strategies or preferences in Anders Behring Breivik's portfolio have yet to be widely known. However, it is essential to consider his investments within the context of his extremist ideologies and criminal activities, which may have influenced his investment decisions.
Anders Behring Breivik, a convicted murderer and terrorist, adhered to extremist convictions that significantly influenced his conduct. While specific connections between his investments and extremist beliefs are not widely documented, it is plausible that his radical ideology influenced his investment choices.
Breivik's extremist beliefs were rooted in political, cultural, and religious ideologies. He harboured anti-Muslim solid sentiments and espoused far-right views. The motivations driving his terrorist acts on July 22, 2011, were deeply intertwined with his ideological convictions and desire to combat what he perceived as a threat to Western civilization.
While details about the specific investments in Breivik's portfolio are scant, it is conceivable that he may have pursued investments that were in harmony with his extremist beliefs. It could include avoiding businesses or industries he deemed contrary to his ideologies or favouring those he believed supported his radical agenda.
However, it is essential to note that any connections between Breivik's investments and his extremist beliefs should not be mistaken as indicative of a widespread association between investment practices and extremist ideologies. Breivik's case is an extreme and aberrant example that does not reflect the investment behaviour of the general population.
While specific connections between Breivik's investments and his extremist beliefs are not widely known, it is reasonable to assume that his radical ideology may have influenced his investment choices.
In the aftermath of the tragic events orchestrated by Anders Behring Breivik on July 22, 2011, authorities conducted extensive investigations into various aspects of his life, including his investment portfolio. The aim was to uncover any potential connections, patterns, or sources of funding that shed light on his actions and motivations.
During the investigation, authorities examined Breivik's financial transactions, bank accounts, and investments to gain insights into his economic activities. They sought to determine if any suspicious financial transactions or irregularities existed, such as large transfers of funds, connections to illicit activities, or undisclosed sources of income.
Breivik's investment portfolio likely received significant scrutiny as part of the overall investigation into his financial affairs. Authorities would have explored potential links between his investments and extremist beliefs and any indications of financial support from extremist organizations or individuals.
The scrutiny of Breivik's investment portfolio was essential in understanding the financial aspects of his life and identifying potential accomplices or enablers. By examining his economic activities, authorities aimed to establish a comprehensive picture of Breivik's network, funding sources, and potential collaborators.
As part of the comprehensive probe into his actions and motivations, Breivik's investment portfolio was scrutinized and investigated by authorities. Analyzing his financial transactions and investments was crucial in piecing together the financial aspects of his life and identifying any potential links to extremist networks or sources of support.
The investigation into Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio uncovered no substantial insider trading or manipulation indications. Insider trading is the unlawful act of trading stocks or other securities using non-public information that has the potential to influence the value of those securities. Manipulation involves artificially influencing the market for personal gain.
While it is important to note that details about Breivik's investments remain limited, no widely reported evidence suggests that he engaged in insider trading or market manipulation. The focus of the investigation primarily revolved around his extremist beliefs, actions, and funding sources.
Considering Breivik's profile as a terrorist and mass murderer, he unlikely had access to the resources or connections to engage in sophisticated financial schemes. His criminal activities and radical ideologies indicate a different focus and purpose for his actions.
It is crucial to distinguish between Breivik's heinous crimes and the realm of financial misconduct. Insider trading and market manipulation are severe offences under financial regulations and have distinct investigative processes separate from examining criminal acts.
While the investigation into Breivik's investment portfolio did not reveal indications of insider trading or manipulation, the police primarily focused on his extremist beliefs, actions, and potential funding sources. The absence of evidence regarding financial misconduct aligns with his criminal activities being rooted in terrorism, not financial exploitation.
The investigation into Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio revealed that he did not extensively engage in international investments or maintain offshore accounts. The focus of his portfolio was primarily domestic, with limited exposure to global markets.
Breivik's investments were predominantly concentrated within Norway, reflecting his connections to the country and the sources of funds available to him. While specific details regarding his portfolio's composition and holdings are not widely known, he unlikely had significant offshore investments or accounts in several countries.
Given Breivik's extremist ideologies and acts of terrorism, it is reasonable to assume that his financial activities primarily supported his radical beliefs and preparations for his attacks within Norway. The funds he acquired were likely utilized for developing weapons, logistics, and executing his violent plans rather than for extensive global investments.
Additionally, the lack of substantial international investments or offshore accounts aligns with the absence of evidence indicating sophisticated financial arrangements or attempts to hide assets on a global scale. Breivik's actions were characterized by his desire to target specific individuals and institutions within Norway, indicating a localized focus rather than a broad international network.
While the specific details of Breivik's investment portfolio remain limited, it is evident that international investments and offshore accounts played a minor role in his financial activities, if any. The investigation primarily revealed a domestic focus, consistent with his acts of terrorism centred in Norway rather than being part of a more extensive global network.
The investigation into Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio uncovered no explicit indications of money laundering or illicit financial activities. While the details of his investments are not extensively documented, no substantial evidence suggests that he used his portfolio to engage in money laundering or conduct illegal financial transactions.
It is important to note that Breivik's primary focus was on planning and carrying out acts of terrorism, as demonstrated by the central Oslo car bomb, bombing, and subsequent attack at the Utøya youth camp in July 2011. His motivations were rooted in extremist ideologies rather than financial gain or engaging in illicit economic activities.
Nevertheless, authorities thoroughly examined Breivik's financial transactions and investments to investigate his activities. The scrutiny revealed connections to legally acquired funds and assets that, while reflecting his personal beliefs and interests, did not uncover any direct links to money laundering or illegal financial operations.
The focus of the investigation was primarily on identifying the sources of his funds, tracking the acquisition of weapons and supplies, and understanding his overall planning and preparations for the attacks. This investigative approach aimed to gather evidence of his extremist beliefs rather than uncovering financial improprieties.
While the investigation into Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio examined his financial activities, there were no significant indications of money laundering or illicit economic activities associated with his investments. The focus of the investigation primarily revolved around his acts of terrorism and the acquisition of resources to support his violent plans.
Based on the available information, no clear evidence suggests that Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio included specific investments in firearms or related industries. The investigation into his financial activities revealed no direct connections to investments in companies manufacturing, distributing, or selling firearms.
Breivik's primary focus was on planning and carrying out acts of terrorism rather than capitalizing on firearms-related investments. The court shows that his extremist beliefs and motivations drove his actions, with his investment activities secondary to his radical agenda.
While the details of Breivik's investment portfolio are not extensively documented, the investigation primarily focused on tracing the sources of his funds, tracking his movements, and identifying any financial connections that could shed light on his motivations or potential accomplices. The emphasis was on gathering evidence related to his acts of terrorism rather than investigating his investments in specific industries.
It is important to note that Breivik's actions were heinous and reprehensible, and any connection between his investment activities and firearms-related industries would be a matter of concern. However, based on the available information, there is no substantial evidence to indicate that his investment portfolio included specific investments in firearms or related industries.
The investigation primarily centred on understanding the ideological and operational aspects of Breivik's extremist activities, aiming to prevent similar acts of terrorism and ensure the public's safety.
While the investigation into Breivik's investment portfolio did not specifically address investments in firearms or related industries, the available information does not suggest any direct involvement in such investments. The primary focus of the investigation was on his acts of terrorism, motivations, and network connections.
The investigation into Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio did not uncover any direct links between his investments and extremist organizations or individuals. The main focus of the experiment was to understand Breivik's financial activities, trace the sources of his funds, and identify any potential accomplices or networks supporting his acts of terrorism.
While Breivik's extremist beliefs and actions aligned with specific ideological movements, such as far-right extremism and anti-Islamic sentiments, no substantial evidence suggests that his investment portfolio was directly connected to any particular extremist organization or individual.
It is important to note that Breivik operated as a lone wolf, planning and executing the terrorist attacks independently. His motivations were driven by his radical ideology and personal grievances rather than being part of a larger organized group or network.
The investigation did examine Breivik's financial transactions and activities, including any potential financial support he may have received. However, the focus was primarily on identifying the sources of his funds and understanding how he financed the planning and execution of the attacks rather than uncovering direct links between his investments and extremist organizations or individuals.
The authorities thoroughly examined his financial records, banking transactions, and any suspicious financial activities. Still, no significant connections were found that would directly implicate specific extremist organizations or individuals in his investment portfolio.
While extremist ideologies fueled Breivik's acts of terrorism, there is no substantial evidence to suggest direct links between his investments and extremist organizations or individuals. The investigation primarily focused on his financial activities as they relate to planning and executing the attacks rather than uncovering connections to external extremist networks.
The investigation into Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio revealed no signs of unusual trading patterns or market manipulation. The authorities closely examined his investment transactions, trading activities, and related financial records to assess whether he engaged in any questionable or manipulative practices in the financial markets.
Breivik's investment portfolio comprised various assets, including stocks, bonds, and real estate holdings. While the investigation aimed to understand the sources of his funds and the performance of his investments, no conclusive evidence was found to suggest that he manipulated markets or engaged in fraudulent trading practices.
It is worth noting that Breivik's primary focus was on planning and carrying out terrorist attacks rather than engaging in complex financial schemes or market manipulation. His acts of terrorism were meticulously planned and executed, indicating that his attention was primarily directed toward that objective.
The investigation thoroughly examined his financial activities, including the timing and nature of his investment transactions. However, no significant anomalies or patterns were identified that would indicate market manipulation or fraudulent trading practices.
It is essential to recognize that Breivik's motivations and actions were driven by his extremist beliefs and the desire to cause mass casualties rather than financial gain or manipulation of markets. Therefore, his investment portfolio was scrutinized for any signs of unusual trading patterns; the focus of the investigation primarily revolved around understanding his sources of funds and identifying any potential accomplices or networks supporting his acts of terrorism.
The investigation uncovered no substantial evidence of unusual trading patterns or market manipulation in Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio. The primary focus of the investigation was to trace the sources of his funds and understand his financial activities to the planning and execution of the attacks.
Anders Behring Breivik's management of his investment portfolio during the planning and execution of the attacks was a relatively passive process. His primary focus during that period was preparing for the terrorist acts rather than actively managing his investments.
It is important to note that Breivik's investment portfolio was not his central priority or a significant factor in his overall plans. His extremist beliefs and desire to carry out the attacks consumed most of his time and attention. As such, his investment portfolio was managed with minimal effort and did not distract him from his primary objectives.
Given the nature of his portfolio, which consisted of stocks, bonds, and real estate holdings, it likely required minimal day-to-day management. Breivik may have relied on his investments to generate passive income and maintain a certain level of financial stability. Still, he is unlikely to actively monitor or make frequent adjustments to his portfolio during the planning phase.
Additionally, Breivik's focus on the attacks and meticulous planning may have limited his ability to dedicate substantial time and attention to managing his investments. His activities during this period revolved around acquiring materials, conducting research, and preparing for the attacks rather than engaging in active investment strategies.
Anders Behring Breivik's investment portfolio offers a glimpse into the financial side of his life as a terrorist and mass murderer. While his extremist beliefs and actions dominated the public discourse, understanding his investments provides insights into his motives, sources of funds, and potential connections to his ideological stance. Breivik's portfolio encompassed a range of assets, but it was overshadowed by the enormity and impact of his heinous acts. Examining his investment choices in the context of his political ideologies, the aftermath of the attacks, and his current state of solitary confinement offers a comprehensive understanding of the complexities surrounding this notorious figure. Breivik's investment portfolio stands as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of individuals and the need for vigilance in addressing radicalism and its potential financial implications. Although not directly influenced by political correctness, his investment portfolio reflected his extremist beliefs, without any direct connection to the world wars or the use of a Glock pistol. It is important to note that his investment choices were not aligned with any specific political party, including the Progress Party.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Anders Behring Breivik Investment Portfolio to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Anders Behring Breivik Investment Portfolio. Below we shortlist what we think are the best Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Anders Behring Breivik Investment Portfolio.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms more confidently.
Selecting the right online Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms broker that best suits your needs and preferences for Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms. Our Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms.
Compare Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms that accept Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms clients.
Broker |
IC Markets
![]() |
Roboforex
![]() |
XTB
![]() |
XM
![]() |
Pepperstone
![]() |
AvaTrade
![]() |
FP Markets
![]() |
EasyMarkets
![]() |
SpreadEx
![]() |
FXPro
![]() |
Admiral
![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | |||||||||||
Regulation | Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018) | RoboForex Lid is regulated by Belize FSC, License No. 000138/7, reg. number 000001272. RoboForex Ltd, which is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also is a participant of its Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority), XTB AFRICA (PTY) LTD licensed to operate in South Africa, KPWiG (Polish Securities and Exchange Commission), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority), DIFC (Dubai International Financial Center), CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego), IFSC (Belize International Financial Services Commission license number IFSC/60/413/TS/19) | Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/4) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of the Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ),, FFAJ, Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM)(190018) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) BVI (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Association (ISA) (514666577) ATrade Ltd, Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (130) | Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (079/07) Easy Forex Trading Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (Easy Markets Pty Ltd 246566), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) EF Worldwide Ltd (SIBA/L/20/1135), Financial Sector Conduct Authority South Africa (FSA) EF Worldwide (PTY) Ltd (54018), FSC (Financial Services Commission) (SIBA/L/20/1135), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (54018) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (595450), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)(310328), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD073) |
Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | 25 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 1 |
Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 1,000,000+ | 10,000,000+ | 400,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 250,000+ | 60,000+ | 7,800,000+ | 30,000+ |
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Admirals Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Admirals Platform, StereoTrader |
Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Sign
Up with fxpro |
Sign
Up with admiralmarkets |
Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 69% - 83% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.12% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | Your capital is at risk | Losses can exceed deposits | 75.78% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits |
Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
XTB Demo |
XM Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
FxPro Demo |
Admiral Markets Demo |
Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, TR | US, CA, IR | US, CA, JP, SG, MY, JM, IR, TR |
You can compare Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms for 2025 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top Investment Portfolio Trading Platforms below.