We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms.

By July 2026, Tesla trades at $313.03 per share with a market capitalization of approximately $1.24 trillion, ranking it as the world's 11th most valuable company. But this electric car manufacturer is not the only company that has grown its market cap to astronomical levels. Meta Platforms, formerly known as Facebook, sits at $595.19 per share with a market capitalization of $1.51 trillion, ranking as the world's 9th or 10th most valuable company. Meta is the number one social media company globally, with Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads under its umbrella, serving over 3 billion monthly active users.
Both Tesla and Meta can be found on the NASDAQ index and are considered essential constituents of the index and the broader technology sector. Tesla joined the NASDAQ in 2010 when it went public at $17 per share, raising $226 million and becoming the first American car manufacturer to go public since Ford's 1956 IPO. Meta went public in 2012 at $38 per share and has since grown its market cap from $81.74 billion to over $1.5 trillion, an increase of more than 1,748 percent. Since Tesla also managed to make its way to the NASDAQ index and eventually the S&P 500, investors have started to think about whether they should go with the already trusted Meta or go along with fast-growing Tesla.
| Metric | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price (July 2026) | $313.03 | $595.19 |
| Market Capitalization | $1.24 Trillion | $1.51 Trillion |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical (Auto Manufacturers) | Communication Services (Interactive Media) |
| Founded | 2003, IPO in 2010 | 2004, IPO in 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Menlo Park, California |
| CEO | Elon Musk | Mark Zuckerberg |
| Employees | 134,785 | 78,900 |
| Financial Metric | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $103.62 Billion | $214.96 Billion | Meta generates over double Tesla's revenue despite having nearly half the employees |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +11.75% | +33% | Meta's advertising business grew three times faster than Tesla's vehicle sales |
| Last Quarter Revenue | $22.39 Billion | $56.31 Billion | Meta earned $56.31 billion in Q2 2026 alone, more than Tesla's entire quarter |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $18.66 Billion | $176.14 Billion | Meta keeps $176 billion of its $215 billion revenue after cost of goods sold |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $10.48 Billion | $106.31 Billion | Meta's EBITDA is over ten times Tesla's, showing vastly superior cash generation |
| Net Income (TTM) | ~$3.5 Billion | $70.59 Billion | Meta earned $70.59 billion in net income, while Tesla earned roughly $3.5 billion |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | ~$1.00 | $27.50 | Meta shareholders earned $27.50 per share compared to Tesla's roughly $1.00 |
| Total Cash | ~$30 Billion | $81.18 Billion | Meta holds over $81 billion in cash, giving it massive flexibility for AI investments |
| Profitability Metric | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 81.9% | For every dollar of revenue, Meta keeps $0.82 after cost of goods while Tesla keeps $0.21 |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 40.6% | Meta's operating margin is nearly ten times Tesla's, showing far more efficient operations |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.2% | 47.5% | Meta converts almost half of revenue to profit while Tesla converts just 2 cents per dollar |
| Return on Equity | ~8% | 32.93% | Meta generates four times more return per dollar of shareholder equity |
| Return on Assets | ~4% | 16.40% | Meta uses its assets four times more efficiently than Tesla to generate profits |
| Debt to Equity | ~0.12 | 0.18 | Both companies maintain conservative balance sheets with low leverage |
| Valuation Metric | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | ~330 | 21.64 | Tesla trades at 330 times earnings while Meta trades at just 21 times, making Meta 15 times cheaper on a P/E basis |
| Forward P/E | ~188 | 19.08 | Even looking ahead, Meta remains dramatically cheaper than Tesla |
| Price to Sales | 11.93 | 7.11 | Tesla trades at 12 times sales while Meta trades at 7 times, reflecting Tesla's growth premium |
| Price to Book | ~45 | 6.20 | Tesla trades at 45 times book value while Meta trades at just 6 times |
| PEG Ratio | ~3.5 | 0.87 | A PEG below 1 suggests Meta is undervalued relative to its growth, while Tesla appears expensive |
| EV to Revenue | ~11 | 7.05 | Enterprise value to revenue shows Meta is more cheaply priced relative to its business size |
| EV to EBITDA | ~118 | 13.60 | Meta trades at 13.6 times EBITDA while Tesla trades at 118 times, an enormous gap |
| Performance Period | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year to Date (2026) | -10.95% | -0.32% | Meta |
| 1 Year Return | +24.36% | +18.71% | Tesla |
| 5 Year Return | +14.03% | +71.74% | Meta |
| 10 Year Annualized | +39.21% | +18.95% | Tesla |
| 52 Week High | $498.83 | $796.25 | Meta |
| 52 Week Low | $297.82 | $520.26 | Meta (higher floor) |
| Distance from 52 Week High | -37.2% | -25.2% | Meta (closer to highs) |
| Current Drawdown from Peak | -18.25% | -15.79% | Meta |
| Risk Metric | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year Volatility | 44.31% | ~32% | Tesla is more volatile, with larger daily price swings than Meta |
| Maximum Drawdown (All Time) | -73.63% | -76.4% | Both stocks have experienced severe drawdowns historically |
| Beta | ~2.0 | 1.25 | Tesla moves twice as much as the market on average, while Meta is more moderate |
| Correlation (1Y) | 0.34 | 0.34 | Tesla and Meta move largely independently, providing diversification benefits |
| Analyst Consensus | Mixed (Hold/Buy) | Strong Buy | 34 buy ratings and 5 strong buy ratings for Meta vs more cautious views on Tesla |
| Price Target (Average) | ~$425 | $819.73 | Analysts see 36% upside for Meta from current levels |
| Return Metric | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0% (No dividend) | 0.36% | Meta pays $2.10 per share annually while Tesla pays nothing |
| Quarterly Dividend | None | $0.50 per share | Meta initiated dividends in 2024 and has maintained them since |
| Payout Ratio | 0% | 7.16% | Meta pays out just 7% of earnings as dividends, leaving room for growth |
| Share Buybacks | Minimal | Multi-billion dollar programs | Meta actively repurchases shares, reducing share count by 1.45% in one year |
| Business Factor | Tesla (TSLA) | Meta Platforms (META) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Revenue Source | Electric vehicle sales, energy storage, regulatory credits | Digital advertising across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp |
| AI Strategy | Full Self Driving, Optimus humanoid robot, Cybercab autonomous ride-hailing | LLaMA AI models, AI-powered advertising, Meta AI assistant, Ray-Ban smart glasses |
| 2026 CapEx Plan | $25+ billion for AI, robotics, manufacturing | $60+ billion for AI data centers (BlackRock partnership) |
| User Base | Millions of vehicle owners worldwide | 3+ billion monthly active users across Family of Apps |
| Key Catalyst 2026 | Robotaxi launch, Optimus robot sales, delivery growth | AI advertising revenue growth, metaverse hardware, LLaMA adoption |
| Competitive Advantage | Vertical integration, Supercharger network, brand loyalty | Massive user base, data advantage, AI infrastructure, network effects |
| Primary Risk | EV competition, execution on robotaxi, regulatory pressure | Regulatory scrutiny, advertising cyclicality, metaverse investment returns |
| Q2 2026 Metric | Tesla | Meta Platforms |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly Revenue | $22.39 Billion | $56.31 Billion |
| Gross Profit | $4.72 Billion | $46.09 Billion |
| Operating Income | $941 Million | $22.87 Billion |
| Net Income | $491 Million | $26.77 Billion |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 40.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 47.5% |
| Category | Advantage | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Scale | Meta | Meta generates $215 billion in revenue vs Tesla's $104 billion |
| Profitability | Meta | Meta's 47.5% net margin dwarfs Tesla's 2.2% margin |
| Valuation | Meta | Meta trades at 21x earnings vs Tesla's 330x, making Meta far cheaper |
| Dividend Income | Meta | Meta pays a 0.36% dividend while Tesla pays nothing |
| Growth Potential | Tesla | Tesla's robotaxi and Optimus robot represent larger total addressable markets |
| Long Term Returns | Tesla | Tesla's 10 year annualized return of 39% beats Meta's 19% |
| Risk Adjusted Returns | Meta | Meta offers better returns per unit of risk with lower volatility and higher margins |
| Analyst Sentiment | Meta | Strong Buy consensus with 39 analysts covering vs mixed views on Tesla |
Facebook is making money and has been a profitable business for several years now. The company is solid financially and has a $56 billion cash flow, giving leverage and a strong position.
On the other side, we have Tesla which is losing money. To keep the company floating, Tesla has been heavily reliant on external capital for years. Tesla came close to bankruptcy in the past, and Elon Musk started looking for a way to sell the company.
If we look at the business model and profitability of each company, it becomes apparent that the trading value of Facebook should be higher than the current levels. But the investors and traders think differently - For this reasdon Tesla is trading at a much higher price tag as compared to Facebook, which is trading below its fair share value.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Tesla Vs Facebook Stock to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Tesla Vs Facebook Stock. Below we shortlist what we think are the best Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Tesla Vs Facebook Stock.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms more confidently.
Selecting the right online Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms broker that best suits your needs and preferences for Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms. Our Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms.
Compare Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms that accept Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms clients.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
SpreadEx
|
EasyMarkets
|
FXPro
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||||||||||
| Regulation | International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd | RoboForex Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Belize under licence No. 000138/32, under the Securities Industry Act 2021, RoboForex Ltd is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also RoboForex Ltd is a participant of the Financial Commission Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076, eToro (ME) Limited (ADGM) Abu Dhabi (UAE) number 220073, eToro (Europe) Ltd (AMF) Autorité des marchés financiers as a digital assets provider France | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157) XTB Limited, CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority XTB MENA Limited licensed 8 July 2021), FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles license number SD148), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority XTB Africa (Pty) Ltd licensed 10 August 2021), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego Polish Financial Supervision Authority) | Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) (49976) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/27) XM Global Limited, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1574), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) / Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd (branch authorisation), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) Ava Trade Markets Ltd (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Authority (ISA) ATrade Ltd (514666577), Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC 0261 of 2024), Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada through Friedberg Direct (IIROC) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (SD 130) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835), licence in Ireland as remote bookmaker for fixed odds betting licence number 1016176 | Easy Forex Trading Ltd is regulated by CySEC (License 079/07). This is the only entity that onboards EU clients. easyMarkets Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC (AFS License 246566), EF Worldwide Ltd (Seychelles) is regulated by FSA (License SD056), EF Worldwide Ltd (British Virgin Islands) is regulated by FSC (License SIBA/L/20/1135), EF Worldwide (PTY) Ltd is regulated by FSCA (License 54018) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) |
| Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | No minimum deposit | 25 | 100 |
| Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 40,000,000+ | 2,000,000+ | 15,000,000+ | 830,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 60,000+ | 250,000+ | 11,200,000+ |
| Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) |
| Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with etoro |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with fxpro |
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 52% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 69% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.48% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 57% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | 62% of retail CFD accounts lose money | 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider |
| Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
eToro Demo |
XTB Demo |
XM Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
FxPro Demo |
| Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, TR | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, CA, IR |
You can compare Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms for 2026 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top Tesla And Facebook Stock Investment Platforms below.
eToro is a multi-asset platform which offers both investing in stocks and cryptoassets, as well as trading CFDs.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 52% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
This communication is intended for information and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
Copy Trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
Crypto investments are risky and may not suit retail investors; you could lose your entire investment. Understand the risks here.
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.
Losses can exceed deposits