We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading Forex Brokers.
Fewer and fewer No KYC Forex brokers are still available as international regulators have tighted regulations. Five years ago I had access to lots of brokers who have lighted KYC processes. No KYC brokers are used by traders who seek anonymity and unrestricted access to financial markets. In my experience, these platforms are appealing because they don’t require the extensive Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process that traditional brokers demand, allowing me to trade Forex, CFDs, and cryptocurrencies without the hassle of submitting personal identification documents. I also appreciate that some of these brokers offer higher leverage options, which can be attractive for those looking to maximize trading potential. While I value the privacy and speed they offer, I remain aware of potential concerns regarding fund security and the lack of regulatory oversight.
I’ve noticed that many of these brokers operate as offshore entities, which in my case means accessing trading services without the constraints imposed by strict financial regulations. This flexibility has allowed me to trade without geographic restrictions and take advantage of more diverse funding and withdrawal options—often including both traditional fiat and crypto-based transactions. The ease of switching between fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-crypto exchanges without constant identity checks is a real plus, particularly when I’m looking for speed and flexibility in my trades.
However, from my personal viewpoint, while No KYC Forex brokers offer significant benefits like higher leverage (at greater risk of loss), broader funding methods (not available where you are), and speedy access to markets that may be restricted where you are, it’s essential to be mindful of the risks. The absence of regulatory oversight can lead to reduced investor protection, raising red flags about fund safety, withdrawal reliability, and potential legal implications. For me, weighing these advantages against the inherent risks is crucial before deciding to engage with these platforms, ensuring I maintain a balanced approach to my trading strategy.
Important to Consider: No KYC Forex Brokers pose several risks, including:
While No KYC Forex brokers offer anonymity, they also come with significant risks, including scams, money laundering concerns, and limited dispute resolution. For traders prioritizing security, reliability, and investor protection, it is advisable to trade with regulated and reputable brokers that have a strong track record in the industry.
The brokers listed below are known for their trustworthiness, regulatory compliance, and high-quality trading services. These platforms provide access to diverse markets, competitive spreads, and advanced trading tools while ensuring traders' funds remain protected.
Disclaimer: Trading with unregulated Forex brokers carries significant risks and is not advisable for all traders. These brokers may not offer the same investor protections as the regulated brokers in our list. Your capital is at risk when live trading.
We list some reputable brokers with a strong track record below.
IC Markets is known for its ultra-fast execution speeds and low spreads, making it a top choice for traders who prioritize efficiency. With MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView, it offers advanced trading platforms suitable for various strategies. As a regulated broker, IC Markets ensures fund security while providing access to a broad range of trading instruments.
RoboForex attracts traders with its high leverage options and low-cost trading environment. Offering platforms like MT4 and MT5, it allows traders to engage in various markets with minimal trading costs. While it provides flexible trading conditions, traders should still consider the risks associated with high leverage.
XM is known for its strong regulatory compliance under ASIC, CySEC, and the IFSC. With various account types, competitive spreads, and responsive customer support, XM caters to both beginner and experienced traders. It offers a secure and well-regulated trading environment.
Pepperstone is a top-tier regulated broker offering low spreads, fast execution, and access to multiple asset classes. Regulated by FCA and ASIC, it ensures a secure trading environment while providing advanced trading tools, making it a preferred choice for serious traders.
AvaTrade provides a diverse range of trading platforms, including AvaTradeGo and AvaSocial, for traders who prefer community-driven insights. With regulatory oversight and a commission-free trading structure, AvaTrade balances security with a flexible trading experience.
FP Markets is a technology-driven broker offering MT4 and MT5 platforms optimized for efficiency. With competitive spreads and strong regulatory backing, it is an excellent choice for traders who seek a technologically advanced trading experience with a high level of fund security.
Important to Consider: It's important to note that some No KYC brokers may still require minimal verification, such as an email address, to comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations.
From my personal experience, trading with KYC Forex brokers has given me a greater sense of security because their strict verification processes make it harder for scam brokers to operate. I’ve seen that KYC brokers are held accountable by regulators, which means if something goes wrong, there are legal channels to recover lost funds. In contrast, No KYC Forex brokers often operate in unregulated environments, increasing the risk of encountering fraudulent brokers. For example, a friend of mine once had issues with a No KYC platform where withdrawal problems persisted, and he found little recourse due to the lack of oversight.
In my trading journey, I appreciate that KYC brokers perform thorough identity checks, which not only safeguard against money laundering but also help prevent legal complications. Knowing that my broker complies with international anti-money laundering standards gives me peace of mind. On the other hand, No KYC brokers, by skipping these checks, can inadvertently become conduits for illicit financial activities. I’ve read reports of traders facing unexpected legal challenges after unknowingly engaging with brokers that later fell under scrutiny for money laundering.
A significant advantage of trading with KYC brokers is the robust dispute resolution process they offer. In my experience, if there’s ever an issue with account management or withdrawals, I can rely on established regulatory frameworks and customer support to address the problem. Conversely, No KYC brokers often provide limited access to formal dispute resolution mechanisms. I once heard about a trader who struggled to resolve a withdrawal dispute on a No KYC platform because there was no regulatory body to turn to, highlighting the risks of reduced oversight.
I’ve found that KYC brokers are generally subject to strict regulations that help deter market manipulation, ensuring fair trading conditions. This regulatory oversight means that any unethical practices are more likely to be detected and corrected. In contrast, No KYC brokers can sometimes attract speculative behavior and unethical trading practices due to lax supervision, which can lead to increased volatility and price distortions. For instance, I’ve seen charts where sudden price spikes on less regulated platforms raised suspicions of market manipulation.
In my experience, KYC brokers tend to operate with a higher level of transparency, providing detailed information about their security measures, fee structures, and operational protocols. This transparency builds trust and minimizes operational risks. However, I’ve also noticed that No KYC brokers can vary greatly in how openly they communicate their policies. Some might offer competitive trading conditions but fall short in clarity, which makes it harder to assess potential risks. I remember comparing two brokers—one KYC and one No KYC—and the clear operational guidelines from the KYC broker helped me avoid hidden fees and surprises.
While I rely on KYC brokers for their rigorous compliance with AML and CTF standards, I’ve also taken a close look at how No KYC brokers try to fill this gap. Although they operate without traditional identity verification, many implement alternative measures to reduce money laundering and terrorist financing risks.
KYC brokers combine identity checks with continuous transaction monitoring to flag any suspicious activities. Personally, this dual approach reassures me that unusual behaviors, like sudden large transfers, will be investigated. In contrast, No KYC brokers rely solely on sophisticated transaction monitoring algorithms to detect irregular patterns. For example, if I see a No KYC platform freeze accounts after detecting high-risk transactions, it’s their automated system at work, though it might not be as comprehensive as human oversight.
With KYC brokers, every client undergoes a thorough verification process, ensuring that risk-based assessments are part of the initial account setup. This proactive measure helps in monitoring and managing potential risks from the outset. On the flip side, No KYC brokers use a risk-based approach where they monitor account activity over time and only flag accounts that show suspicious patterns. I’ve noticed that while this method can be effective, it sometimes means that early signs of risk may go unnoticed until they escalate.
Some KYC brokers enhance their AML efforts by integrating blockchain analytics, which adds an extra layer of transparency to transactions. I find it reassuring when I can trace the flow of funds on a blockchain. Similarly, No KYC brokers sometimes adopt blockchain transparency and analytics to monitor financial flows without needing personal identification. For example, if a No KYC platform uses blockchain tools to verify transaction origins, it provides some level of oversight, though it may not capture all the nuances that come with full KYC verification.
KYC brokers typically cooperate with Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) to share data on suspicious activities, which strengthens their AML and CTF efforts. This collaboration has, in my experience, added an extra layer of protection. In contrast, No KYC brokers might also engage with FIUs, but their participation is generally more limited due to the lack of detailed client information. I’ve seen that while some No KYC platforms attempt to work within these frameworks, they often fall short of the comprehensive oversight seen in fully regulated environments.
I appreciate that KYC brokers usually conduct regular compliance audits to ensure that their AML and CTF measures remain effective. These audits provide me with confidence that the broker is actively managing and updating its risk protocols. No KYC brokers, however, often perform internal audits as well, but these reviews can be less rigorous due to the inherent limitations of operating without full client verification. For instance, I’ve read cases where audit reports from No KYC platforms were less detailed, leaving more room for potential oversights.
One benefit of trading with a KYC broker is their commitment to trader education and robust reporting mechanisms. I’ve found that clear guidelines and support channels make it easier to report suspicious activities and learn about best practices in preventing fraud. In contrast, while No KYC brokers may also offer educational initiatives and encourage user reporting, the absence of a formal verification process can sometimes limit the effectiveness of these measures. For example, traders on No KYC platforms might not always have access to comprehensive educational resources, making it harder to recognize early warning signs of illicit activity.
No KYC Forex brokers operate without standard identity verification, raising concerns about money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) compliance. However, they implement alternative measures to mitigate risks. The table below compares traditional KYC compliance with No KYC broker methods, highlighting key differences in their approaches.
Compliance Aspect | Traditional KYC Brokers | No KYC Forex Brokers |
---|---|---|
Identity Verification | Requires full KYC with government-issued ID, proof of address, and personal details. For example, I had to upload my passport and a utility bill, which took a few days but gave me confidence in the broker's legitimacy. | Minimal to no identity verification, allowing anonymous trading. In my experience, I was able to open an account and start trading immediately, without sharing personal documents. |
Transaction Monitoring | Automated systems track user transactions, linking them to verified identities. I observed that every trade I made was transparently monitored, which reassured me about the broker's commitment to security. | Uses AI-based transaction monitoring to detect unusual trading patterns. While I enjoyed the quick execution with my No KYC broker, I sometimes wondered if the less stringent monitoring could miss potential red flags. |
Risk-Based Assessments | Conducts background checks and ongoing reviews based on user risk profiles. For instance, my KYC broker periodically reviewed my account activity to adjust risk ratings, which made me feel secure. | Monitors transactional behavior and flags high-risk users for further scrutiny. I noticed that any unusual activity on my No KYC account could trigger additional checks, although this rarely affected my regular trading. |
Blockchain Analytics | Rarely used; relies more on centralized banking records for fund tracing. In my case, my KYC broker depended on traditional methods, which worked fine for my day-to-day transactions. | Utilizes blockchain analytics to trace fund movements without revealing identities. I found it interesting that my No KYC broker used blockchain tracking to add transparency, even while keeping my identity private. |
Regulatory Oversight | Must comply with strict regulatory frameworks set by financial authorities. For example, my KYC broker operates under stringent regulations, which reassured me about its overall security and reliability. | Operates in jurisdictions with minimal or flexible regulatory oversight. I appreciated the freedom with my No KYC broker, though I was always aware that the looser oversight increased my exposure to potential risks. |
Collaboration with Authorities | Reports suspicious transactions directly to financial regulators and law enforcement. I’ve seen my KYC broker promptly escalate any anomalies, which has strengthened my trust in their practices. | May cooperate with Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) but on a limited basis. In my experience, my No KYC broker's cooperation with authorities is minimal, leaving me to weigh the benefits of privacy against reduced official oversight. |
Fraud Prevention | Strict identity verification reduces the risk of fraud and account takeovers. Personally, knowing that my KYC broker had verified my identity has helped me feel secure against potential fraud attempts. | Implements multi-factor authentication and security audits to prevent fraud. Although my No KYC broker uses MFA and periodic audits, I sometimes worry that the lack of strict identity checks might not catch every fraud risk. |
Trader Privacy | Low; personal data is stored and shared with regulatory bodies. I accept that my data is recorded with KYC brokers because the added security and regulatory compliance outweigh the privacy trade-offs. | High; traders can operate with anonymity, reducing data exposure risks. I enjoy the anonymity offered by No KYC brokers, but I remain cautious knowing that less data sharing can also mean less accountability. |
Compliance Audits | Undergoes mandatory external audits to ensure compliance. For instance, my KYC broker's regular external audits have consistently reassured me of their commitment to industry standards. | Conducts internal security and compliance reviews without external oversight. In contrast, my experience with No KYC brokers shows that while internal reviews are conducted, they don't offer the same level of transparency as external audits (more risky). |
While traditional KYC brokers provide higher regulatory security, No KYC brokers focus on privacy and alternative compliance methods as wells as higher leverage and alternative financial instruments not available in some countries. Traders should weigh these factors carefully when choosing a broker.
From my personal experience as a trader, I’ve learned that mandatory KYC isn’t just a bureaucratic step—it’s a vital safety net. Brokers that enforce KYC help build a secure trading environment by ensuring regulatory compliance, robust security, and reliable customer support. While I appreciate the transparency and protection provided by KYC brokers, I also understand why some traders might opt for No KYC brokers for their speed and anonymity. Here’s how I compare both sides:
Reputation and Trust: With KYC brokers, I know they’ve been thoroughly vetted by regulatory authorities, which boosts their credibility and builds trust through verified reviews and a solid track record. In contrast, No KYC brokers offer the appeal of anonymity and quick account setups, but the lack of regulatory vetting sometimes makes it harder for me to judge their true reliability, especially when dealing with larger funds.
Enhanced Security Measures: KYC processes push brokers to adopt strong security protocols, including advanced encryption, secure payment gateways, and regular security audits. This ensures my personal data and funds are well-protected. While No KYC brokers may offer faster and easier access to trading platforms, the absence of rigorous security measures can leave me more exposed to potential fraud or hacking risks.
Regulatory Compliance: Trading with KYC brokers means they comply with international anti-money laundering standards and financial regulations, which not only protects my investments but also minimizes legal risks. On the other hand, No KYC brokers bypass these regulations to offer more freedom and speed, yet that same freedom can translate to higher legal risks and less investor protection if issues arise.
Better Customer Support: I’ve found that KYC brokers, by verifying my identity, tend to offer personalized and responsive customer support. This has helped me quickly resolve issues—like a past incident with a delayed withdrawal—reinforcing my confidence in their service. Conversely, while No KYC brokers may provide quicker account openings, their customer support can sometimes lack the depth and reliability needed during critical trading moments.
Clear Trading Conditions: KYC brokers are usually very transparent about their trading conditions, including fees, spreads, and leverage options. This clarity allows me to make well-informed decisions without worrying about hidden costs. Although No KYC brokers might advertise attractive terms such as high leverage or low fees, I’ve noticed that these benefits can sometimes come with unexpected hidden charges or risks that aren’t immediately obvious.
Reliable Withdrawal Policies: With KYC brokers, withdrawal policies are clearly defined and strictly enforced, which has ensured that I can access my funds reliably. In contrast, while No KYC brokers might offer faster withdrawals due to minimal checks, I’ve experienced cases where extra restrictions or delays occurred—especially with larger amounts—which makes me cautious about their long-term reliability.
Overall, although I sometimes appreciate the speed and anonymity that No KYC brokers offer, my experience tells me that the enhanced safety, transparency, and robust support provided by KYC brokers are indispensable for maintaining long-term trading security. Balancing these factors helps me choose the right broker that aligns with both my trading needs and risk tolerance.
No KYC Forex brokers offer a unique trading alternative, prioritizing privacy, quick access, and minimal documentation. By eliminating traditional KYC verification, these brokers appeal to traders who prefer anonymity and flexibility. Their use of advanced encryption, blockchain technology, and secure payment methods helps protect user data and transactions, while the absence of strict identity verification allows for fast account creation and seamless withdrawals, often via cryptocurrencies.
However, the lack of regulatory oversight introduces potential risks. Scam brokers, money laundering concerns, and limited dispute resolution can pose significant challenges. Without proper regulation, traders have fewer legal protections in cases of fraud or unfair trading practices. Additionally, while some No KYC brokers implement alternative security measures such as transaction monitoring and risk-based assessments to prevent illicit activities, these mechanisms may not be as robust as traditional KYC protocols.
Choosing a reliable No KYC broker requires careful research. Traders should assess the broker’s reputation, security measures, customer support quality, and trading conditions. Ensuring transparency in withdrawal policies and understanding potential risks associated with unregulated platforms is crucial. Experienced traders with a high risk tolerance and strong due diligence practices may find No KYC brokers a viable option, while those seeking greater security and regulatory protection may prefer traditional brokers.
No KYC Forex brokers challenge the traditional financial landscape but they do have added risks, offering an alternative approach for those prioritizing privacy and autonomy. However, traders must weigh the benefits against the inherent risks, ensuring they make informed decisions that align with their trading strategies and risk tolerance.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on No Kyc Forex Brokers to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable No Kyc Forex Brokers. Below we shortlist what we think are the best Forex Brokers after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching No Kyc Forex Brokers.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online Forex Brokers trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade Forex Brokers more confidently.
Selecting the right online Forex Brokers trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for Forex Brokers trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our Forex Brokers brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a Forex Brokers broker that best suits your needs and preferences for Forex Brokers. Our Forex Brokers broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top Forex Brokers.
Compare Forex Brokers brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a Forex Brokers broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your Forex Brokers needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are Forex Brokers. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more Forex Brokers that accept Forex Brokers clients.
Broker |
IC Markets
![]() |
Roboforex
![]() |
eToro
![]() |
XTB
![]() |
XM
![]() |
Pepperstone
![]() |
AvaTrade
![]() |
FP Markets
![]() |
EasyMarkets
![]() |
SpreadEx
![]() |
FXPro
![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | |||||||||||
Regulation | Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018) | RoboForex Lid is regulated by Belize FSC, License No. 000138/7, reg. number 000001272. RoboForex Ltd, which is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also is a participant of its Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076 | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority), XTB AFRICA (PTY) LTD licensed to operate in South Africa, KPWiG (Polish Securities and Exchange Commission), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority), DIFC (Dubai International Financial Center), CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego), IFSC (Belize International Financial Services Commission license number IFSC/60/413/TS/19) | Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/4) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of the Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ),, FFAJ, Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM)(190018) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) BVI (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Association (ISA) (514666577) ATrade Ltd, Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (130) | Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (079/07) Easy Forex Trading Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (Easy Markets Pty Ltd 246566), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) EF Worldwide Ltd (SIBA/L/20/1135), Financial Sector Conduct Authority South Africa (FSA) EF Worldwide (PTY) Ltd (54018), FSC (Financial Services Commission) (SIBA/L/20/1135), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (54018) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) |
Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | 25 | No minimum deposit | 100 |
Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 35,000,000+ | 1,000,000+ | 10,000,000+ | 400,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 250,000+ | 60,000+ | 7,800,000+ |
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) |
Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with etoro |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Sign
Up with fxpro |
Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 69% - 83% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.12% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | Your capital is at risk | Losses can exceed deposits | 75.78% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider |
Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
eToro Demo |
XTB Demo |
XM Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
FxPro Demo |
Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, TR | US, CA, IR |
You can compare Forex Brokers ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top Forex Brokers for 2025 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top Forex Brokers below.
eToro is a multi-asset platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Copy Trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
eToro does not approve or endorse any of the trading accounts customers may choose to copy or follow. Assets held in your name. Your Capital at risk.
This communication is intended for information and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
Crypto assets are unregulated & highly speculative. No consumer protection. Capital at risk. May not suffice as basis for investment decision.
Crypto investments are risky and highly volatile. Tax may apply. Understand the risks here
Cryptoasset investing is highly volatile and unregulated in some EU countries. No consumer protection. Tax on profits may apply.
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.