Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk for 2024

Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Explained

Trading volatile financial markets with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk can be challenging, even for experienced traders. In addition to the online educational resources available, traders should consider the platform offered by Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk to ensure a successful trading experience.

Selecting Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk at the forefront of innovation and considered an industry leader is crucial. Doing so will ensure you are equipped with the tools and features to navigate volatile Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk markets effectively.

Reliability is key to gaining access to financial markets. Look for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk that you can rely on to provide a stable and secure trading environment, allowing you to execute trades with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk confidently.

6 Factors to Consider when Choosing Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk

Follow these five rules for selecting Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk that are right for you:

Are Your Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Trusted And Established?

Search for a reputable Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk with a extensive proven track record for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk, enabling you to focus solely on implementing your trading strategy and navigating the markets with confidence. The top rated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk broker is IC Markets. Established in 2007, and in operation for 12 years IC Markets have a head office in Australia.

IC Markets is regulated. This means IC Markets are supervised by and is checked for conduct by Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) regulatory bodies.

Another top rated broker is Roboforex.

Roboforex was established 2009, and in operation for 9 years Roboforex have a head office in Belize.

Roboforex is regulated. This means Roboforex are supervised by and is checked for conduct by Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) regulatory bodies.

Broker	IC Markets	Roboforex	eToro	XTB	XM	Pepperstone	AvaTrade	FP Markets
Year Established	2007	2009	2007	2002	2009	2010	2006	2005
Head Office	Australia	Belize	Cyprus, UK	Poland	Cyprus	Australia	Ireland	Australia
Regulation	Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)	RoboForex Ltd is regulated by the FSC, license 000138/437, reg. number 128.572. RoboForex Ltd, which is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also is a participant of its Compensation Fund	FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076	FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority), XTB AFRICA (PTY) LTD licensed to operate in South Africa, KPWiG (Polish Securities and Exchange Commission), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority), DIFC (Dubai International Financial Center), CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego), IFSC (Belize International Financial Services Commission license number IFSC/60/413/TS/19)	Financial Services Commission (FSC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)	Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of the Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217	Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), ASIC (406684), Financial Services Authority (FSA), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), Financial Stability Board (FSB), The Financial Services Agency (JAPAN FSA), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM), Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA), Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), Israel Securities Association (ISA), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI), BVI (SIBA/L/13/1049), Central Bank of Ireland	Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), FSCA (FSP Number 50926), Capital Markets Authority (CMA), Securities Commission of the Bahamas (SCB)
Used By	180,000+	1,000,000+	30,000,000+	1,000,000+	10,000,000+	400,000+	300,000+	10,000+
Negative balance protection	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Guaranteed Stop Loss	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	No
Learn More	Visit IC Markets	Visit Roboforex	Visit eToro	Visit XTB	Visit XM	Visit Pepperstone	Visit AvaTrade	Visit FP Markets
Risk Warning	Losses can exceed deposits	Losses can exceed deposits	76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.	76-85% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.	CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 72.89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.	74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs	71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider	Losses can exceed deposits

Are The Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk World Leading?

Opt for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk that set themselves apart as an industry leader by actively embracing innovation. Take IC Markets as an example, which is renowned for Segregates clients funds and boasts an extensive array of 2250 tradable instruments. Moreover, IC Markets caters to the needs of its clients with both an online trading platform and a mobile application, making it incredibly convenient to access the markets from anywhere, at any time.

In addition, the IC Markets platform enables access to a variety of financial markets worldwide. IC Markets is a world-leader when it comes to innovation and they are always looking at ways to improve and to maintain their competitive advantage.

Another good choice when looking for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk is Roboforex. Roboforex Segregates clients funds and offers over 100 instruments.

Broker	IC Markets	Roboforex	eToro	XTB	XM	Pepperstone	AvaTrade	FP Markets
Instruments Available	2250	100	5000	5600	1000	1200	1250	290
Platforms	MT4, MT5, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, cTrader, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android	MT4, MT5, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps	Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps	MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps	MT4, MT5, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps	MT4, MT5, TradingView, DupliTrade, myFXbook, Mac, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps	Web Trader, MT4, MT5, AvaTradeGo, AvaOptions, DupliTrade, ZuluTrade, Mobile Apps, ZuluTrade, DupliTrade, MQL5	MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps
Excluded Countries	US, IR, CA, NZ, JP	AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH	ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MG, MK, MO, UA, JO, KR,	US, AU, CA, JP, KR, KP, SG, MU, IL, TR, IN, PK, BA, ET, UG, CU, SY, BD, NG, ID, BE, LY, MO, KE, YE, VU, GY, CD, CG, AF, LA, MZ, IQ, IR	US, CA, IL, IR	AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET	BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG	US, JP, NZ
Forex pairs offered	61	35	50	57	55	70	55	70
Forex pairs offered	61	35	50	57	55	70	55	70
Major forex pairs	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Minor forex pairs	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Exotic forex pairs	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Cryptocurrencies (availability subject to regulation)	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Commodities Offered	20	21	31	21	15	16	17	18
Metals	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Energies	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Agricultural	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Stocks Offered	2100	0	2042	1696	160	1100	1000	10000
UK Shares	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
US Shares	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
German Shares	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Japanese Shares	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes

What are the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Commissions and Fees?

Ensure that your broker is transparent with fees and those dues are competitive.

The best rated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk broker IC Markets offers competitive offers for Forex, CFDs, Spread Betting, Share dealing, Cryptocurrencies. IC Markets minimum deposit is 200.

Another top rated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk broker Roboforex offers Forex, CFDs. Roboforex minimum deposit is 10. Please note that any cryptocurrency availability with any broker is subject to regulation.

Broker	IC Markets	Roboforex	eToro	XTB	XM	Pepperstone	AvaTrade	FP Markets
Min Deposit	200	10	100	0	5	200	100	100
Withdrawl Fees	No	Yes	Yes	varies	No	No	No	No
Inactivity Fees	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No
Deposit Fees	Varies	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes
CFD Commission Fees	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes

What are the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Funding and Withdrawal Methods?

Efficient and hassle-free funding and withdrawal facilities can significantly improve your overall trading experience when dealing with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk. It streamlines the trading process and helps you focus on making informed decisions rather than worrying about deposit and withdrawal matters with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.

Broker	IC Markets	Roboforex	eToro	XTB	XM	Pepperstone	AvaTrade	FP Markets
Bank transfer	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Credit Cards	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Paypal	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Skrill	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes
Payoneer	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No
Neteller	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes

Find Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk with Round-the-clock support?

Effective customer service is an essential factor to consider when dealing with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.

Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk customer service entails various support services to aid customers in making the most cost-effective and appropriate use of the brokers' services.

The customer support options offered by Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk can include phone answering services, live chat support, and email customer service support.

IC Markets support a wide range of languages including English, Japanese, Chinese, Polish, Afrikans, Danish, Dutch, German and more

Roboforex support a wide range of languages including English, Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Indonesian, Malaysian, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Arabic, Thai, Russian, and Ukrainian

IC Markets and Roboforex offer support where clients are able to call or contact the helpdesk via email or a chat service.

Broker	IC Markets	Roboforex	eToro	XTB	XM	Pepperstone	AvaTrade	FP Markets
Support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support	Live chat Phone support Email support
Languages	English, Japanese, Chinese, Polish, Afrikans, Danish, Dutch, German and more	English, Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Indonesian, Malaysian, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Arabic, Thai, Russian, and Ukrainian	English, German, Spanish, French, Italian	English, Spanish, Czech, Chinese, German, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovenian, and Turkish	Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish	English, Spanish, Portuguese, Thai, Russian, Italian, French, German, Polish, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Arabic	Arabic, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Indonesian, Japanese, Mongolian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Malay, Korean and Turkish	English, Arabic, Indonesian, Italian, Spanish, French, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, German, Portuguese, Thai, French, Malay, Greek, Vietnamese, Romanian, Turkish, Slovenian, Dutch, Polish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish, Serbian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Galician, Estonian, Danish, Czech, Croatian, Bulgarian, Basque
Learn More	Visit IC Markets	Visit Roboforex	Visit eToro	Visit XTB	Visit XM	Visit Pepperstone	Visit AvaTrade	Visit FP Markets
Risk Warning	Losses can exceed deposits	Losses can exceed deposits	76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.	76-85% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.	CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 72.89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.	74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs	71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider	Losses can exceed deposits

Make sure the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Offer Comprehensive Trader resources?

It's important to ensure your Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk provide complimentary resources such as analysis, education, and risk management tools. IC Markets and Roboforex collaborate with top analysts to bring the most up-to-date news and insights to traders.

Sound risk and money management are vital to financial market navigation with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk. However, selecting the best broker to access the markets is a critical step that traders should not overlook as they embark on trading live financial markets with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.

Why Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk needs to be regulated?

Regulated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk lowers your risk of loss of deposited trading funds.

Lowering your risk is one of the benefits of working with a properly regulated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.

Consumers are protected by Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk regulation, critical to preventing inadequate services and potential financial harm.

Regulation of Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk is necessary to prevent fraud. The Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk working capital and client-funded accounts must be kept separate to avoid conducting business with client funds. Any fraudulent behaviour with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk is monitored by financial regulators in the jurisdictions brokers are allowed to operate.