Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk for 2026
We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading Online Trading Platform.
Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Guide
Analysis by Andrew Blumer, Updated Last updated – September 12, 2026
Dealing Desk vs Non-Dealing Desk
I think choosing the right broker matters greatly in Forex trading. It is completely a personal choice, but of course, it is based on strategies and the type of trader a person is. As the title 'Dealing Desk vs Non-Dealing Desk' reveals, there are basically two types of brokers. One is a 'Dealing Desk Broker' and the other is called a 'Non-Dealing Desk Broker'. In this article, I will walk through some of the important aspects of the two, and why each is different than the other.
| Trading Factor | Dealing Desk | Non Dealing Desk | My Trading View |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Structure | When I trade through a Dealing Desk broker, the broker can act as the counterparty to my trade and manage the execution internally. | When I trade through a Non Dealing Desk broker, my order is generally routed to external liquidity sources or matched through an electronic execution structure. | I see the main difference as how my order is handled and where the price and liquidity for execution come from. |
| Trade Example | If I buy EUR USD at 1.1000 for EUR 10000, the Dealing Desk broker may take the opposite side or manage the exposure internally. | If I buy EUR USD at 1.1000 for EUR 10000, the Non Dealing Desk broker may route the order to available external liquidity. | The market exposure can look identical to me even though the execution process behind the trade is different. |
| Position Value Example | Buying EUR 10000 at EUR USD 1.1000 represents approximately USD 11000 of notional value. | Buying EUR 10000 at EUR USD 1.1000 also represents approximately USD 11000 of notional value. | The position size does not change simply because I use a different execution model. |
| Spread Example | A Dealing Desk broker might quote EUR USD at 1.1000 to buy and 1.0998 to sell, creating a spread of 2 pips. | A Non Dealing Desk broker might show 1.1000 to buy and 1.0999 to sell, creating a spread of 1 pip, potentially with a separate commission. | I compare the total trading cost rather than assuming that the smallest displayed spread is automatically cheaper. |
| Commission Example | If the spread represents approximately USD 2 of cost on my position and there is no separate commission, my initial transaction cost is approximately USD 2. | If the spread represents approximately USD 1 and the applicable commission is USD 1.50, my total transaction cost becomes approximately USD 2.50. | I calculate spread and commission together when comparing execution costs. |
| Fixed Spread Example | A Dealing Desk broker may offer a spread that remains around 2 pips under specified normal market conditions. | A Non Dealing Desk spread may move from 0.5 pip to 3 pips or more as available liquidity changes. | I may get more predictable quoted costs from some Dealing Desk models while accepting that actual terms depend on the broker. |
| Variable Spread Example | If EUR USD normally has a 2 pip spread, the broker may maintain or adjust its quotation depending on its pricing model. | If EUR USD normally has a 0.8 pip spread, it could widen to 4 pips during a major economic announcement. | With Non Dealing Desk execution I expect spreads to reflect changes in underlying market liquidity more directly. |
| Order Execution | My order can be executed within the broker's internal dealing structure. | My order can be passed through to external liquidity providers or electronic matching systems depending on the broker's model. | I examine execution quality rather than judging a broker from the label alone. |
| Liquidity | The broker can provide its own quoted liquidity to me and manage client positions internally. | Available liquidity can come from banks, institutions and other liquidity sources connected to the broker. | With Non Dealing Desk execution I pay close attention to the depth and quality of the broker's liquidity relationships. |
| Counterparty Example | If I make USD 500 on a position, the broker may have been my direct counterparty depending on how it managed the trade. | If I make USD 500 on a position, my broker may primarily have facilitated execution while external counterparties provided the liquidity. | I understand that the precise counterparty relationship depends on the broker, account and execution arrangement. |
| Conflict of Interest | A potential conflict can exist when the broker is directly taking the opposite side of my position. | The direct counterparty conflict may be reduced when orders are passed to external liquidity sources. | I do not assume that one model automatically guarantees better treatment because regulation and execution practices also matter. |
| Slippage Example | If I submit a buy order at 1.1000, I might receive 1.1001 depending on the broker's execution and market conditions. | If I submit a buy order at 1.1000, external liquidity may result in execution at 1.1001 or another available price. | I understand that slippage can occur under either model, especially when prices are moving quickly. |
| Positive Slippage | If the market moves in my favour before execution, whether I receive the improved price depends on the broker's execution policy. | If better external liquidity becomes available, my order may potentially receive an improved execution price. | I look for brokers that clearly explain how both positive and negative slippage are handled. |
| Fast Market Example | During a major announcement, a quoted price of 1.1000 could change before my order is completed. | During the same announcement, available external prices could move rapidly from 1.1000 to 1.1005. | I expect execution uncertainty under both models when volatility rises sharply. |
| Profit Example | If I buy EUR 10000 at 1.1000 and close at 1.1050, the 50 pip movement produces approximately USD 50 before trading costs. | If I make the same EUR 10000 trade through Non Dealing Desk execution, the approximate gross market gain is also USD 50 before costs. | The execution model does not change the basic market calculation, but spreads, commissions and execution prices affect my net result. |
| Cost Example | If my gross trading profit is USD 50 and total trading costs are USD 4, my approximate net result is USD 46. | If my gross trading profit is USD 50 and the combined spread and commission cost is USD 3, my approximate net result is USD 47. | I compare net results because a small difference in transaction cost can become significant across many trades. |
| 100 Trade Example | If my average transaction cost is USD 4, completing 100 comparable trades represents approximately USD 400 in trading costs. | If my average transaction cost is USD 3, completing 100 comparable trades represents approximately USD 300 in trading costs. | A USD 1 difference per trade becomes USD 100 across 100 trades, so execution costs matter more as my trading frequency increases. |
| Scalping | If I target only 5 pips and pay a 2 pip spread, a large part of my potential move is already absorbed by transaction costs. | If I target 5 pips and my total spread and commission cost is equivalent to 1 pip, less of the target is consumed by costs. | For short term trading I focus heavily on spreads, commissions, slippage and execution speed. |
| Transparency | I depend more heavily on the broker's internal pricing and execution policies. | I may receive pricing derived from several external liquidity sources depending on the execution structure. | I prefer to understand exactly how prices are generated rather than relying only on the Dealing Desk or Non Dealing Desk label. |
| Broker Revenue | The broker can earn revenue through spreads and potentially through its management of client exposure. | The broker can earn revenue through commissions, spread markups or other disclosed trading charges. | I check the complete fee structure so I understand how the broker earns money from my trading activity. |
| Trade Planning | I consider quoted spreads, execution rules, requote policies, counterparty structure and broker regulation. | I consider variable spreads, commissions, liquidity providers, execution speed, slippage and broker regulation. | I compare actual execution quality and total cost rather than choosing purely from the execution model name. |
| Overall Trading Character | A Dealing Desk model can give me broker controlled pricing and execution with potentially more predictable quoted conditions. | A Non Dealing Desk model can give me pricing and execution that are more directly connected to external liquidity conditions. | I see the choice as a comparison of pricing, execution, transparency and total cost rather than assuming that either structure is automatically superior. |
What is Dealing Desk?
In simple terms, a dealing desk is a place at a financial institution or bank where a dealer physically sits. The forex market is open 24 hours a day, Monday through Friday, which means one can trade around the clock. To keep up with this, many financial institutions employ a dealing desk in several countries to help clients execute trades any time, day or night.
The dealing desk is not just limited to the foreign exchange market. Other financial assets are executed through dealing desks too, including equities, commodities, options and ETFs.
What is Non-Dealing Desk?
A Non-Dealing Desk, or NDD, is basically a trading model that gives clients access to prices sourced from external liquidity providers rather than a single internal desk. Instead of a broker setting quotes itself, an NDD broker routes orders out to the market. Under this umbrella sit two common execution styles, 1, Straight Through Processing, known as STP, and 2, Electronic Communication Network, known as ECN. Both are considered No Dealing Desk models, but they route orders a bit differently. An STP broker sends the order to a small group of liquidity providers, usually banks, and earns through a small markup added to the price. An ECN broker connects the order into a wider network where banks and other participants compete directly against each other, and this is usually paired with a separate commission per trade rather than a markup built into the spread.
Dealing Desk vs Non-Dealing Desk, Key Highlights
- 1, With a Dealing Desk, traders do not deal directly with the market, and rates are set by the broker. With NDD, clients trade on prices sourced from outside liquidity providers.
- 2, Some traders who have had a bad experience with a poorly regulated NDD broker end up preferring a well known Dealing Desk broker instead, so the 'better' choice really depends on the specific broker's reputation and regulation, not just the model itself.
- 3, With NDD, the broker's revenue is tied to trading volume rather than client losses, which reduces, though does not fully remove, the potential for conflict of interest.
Dealing Desk Issues
Also known as 'market makers', Dealing Desk brokers set both the bid and ask prices for clients, which can work to their own advantage. The broker earns from the spread, the small gap between the buy and sell price. Many of them try to keep trades in house within their own liquidity pool rather than pushing them out to external liquidity providers, since this lets them profit directly when a client's trade goes against them. This is exactly the conflict of interest people mean when they say a market maker 'trades against its own clients'. Because of this, a good number of traders now lean toward brokers offering fixed spreads and clear disclosure, so at least the cost is transparent even if the model itself carries the conflict.
With a Dealing Desk, I would be aware there is effectively another party on the other side of my trade, and disputes can happen, for example a broker declining to honour a profit by claiming the price was filled incorrectly. Delays in order execution and requotes are also a known complaint with this model, especially when the desk is dealing with a large number of clients at once during volatile moments like a major news release.
Non-Dealing Desk Environment
In a Non-Dealing Desk setup, client orders are matched automatically against a pool of liquidity providers, since the process is computer driven and near instantaneous. This is one of the main reasons retail forex traders in 2026 tend to prefer NDD brokers, particularly STP and ECN, when they are properly regulated.
Dealing Desk vs Non-Dealing Desk, Differences
It would not be accurate to say all Dealing Desk brokers are dishonest. Before Non-Dealing Desk models became widely available, Dealing Desk brokers were the norm across the industry, going back to the early days of retail forex in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Over time, a number of poorly regulated dealing desk operators damaged the reputation of the model as a whole, and traders gradually shifted toward NDD execution.
One thing worth flagging from my own research, some brokers market themselves as 'ECN' while still routing part of their retail flow through an internal desk. Genuine NDD execution can usually be confirmed by checking the broker's order execution policy, looking for variable rather than fixed spreads, and confirming regulation with a tier one authority such as the FCA, ASIC or CySEC, since these regulators specifically audit execution quality.
Dealing Desk Vs Non Dealing Desk Verdict
In my view, brokers are not inherently working against traders. They want an ongoing business relationship with their clients, and a broker's long term interest is usually served by clients who keep trading rather than clients who blow up their account and leave. That said, the two models create genuinely different incentives. A Dealing Desk broker typically earns from fixed spreads and can take the opposite side of a client's trade, so their quoted prices are, by definition, set internally rather than pulled straight from the market. An STP broker usually offers variable spreads with a small markup and passes orders to liquidity providers. An ECN broker usually charges a separate commission and connects orders into a wider network of competing participants, generally with tighter raw spreads.
With a Dealing Desk, orders are filled at the broker's discretion rather than automatically. With STP and ECN, orders are generally filled automatically and requotes are rare to non existent, though this depends heavily on the specific broker's technology and regulation.
Most traders today lean toward NDD over Dealing Desk, but it is not fair to say every Dealing Desk broker is untrustworthy, plenty are well regulated and transparent about their model. What matters most is doing due diligence on the specific broker, checking its regulatory status and reading its execution policy, rather than assuming the label alone guarantees fair treatment. That said, for beginners specifically, I would still lean toward starting with a well regulated NDD broker, since it removes one layer of risk, namely the possibility of a conflict of interest with the person filling your order.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk. Below we shortlist what we think are the best Online trading platform after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.
Reputable Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Checklist
Selecting a reliable and reputable online Online Trading Platform trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade Online Trading Platform more confidently.
Selecting the right online Online Trading Platform trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
- Ensure your chosen Online Trading Platform broker has a solid track record of at least two years in the industry.
- Verify that the Online Trading Platform broker has a customer support team of at least 15 members responsive to queries and concerns.
- Check if the Online Trading Platform broker operates under the regulatory framework of a jurisdiction that can hold it accountable for any misconduct or resolve disputes fairly and impartially.
- Ensure that the Online Trading Platform broker can process deposits and withdrawals within two to three days, which is crucial when you need to access your funds quickly.
- Look for Online Trading Platform brokers with an international presence in multiple countries, offering its clients local seminars and training programs.
- Ensure the Online Trading Platform broker can hire staff from diverse locations worldwide who can communicate fluently in your local language.
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
Compare Key Features of Online Trading Platform in Our Brokerage Comparison Table
When choosing a broker for Online trading platform trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our Online trading platform brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
- Minimum deposit requirement for opening an account with each Online trading platform broker.
- The funding methods available for Online trading platform with each broker.
- The types of instruments you can trade with each Online trading platform broker, such as forex, stocks, commodities, and indices.
- The trading platforms each Online trading platform broker provides, including their features, ease of use, and compatibility with your devices.
- The spread type (if applicable) for each Online trading platform broker affects the cost of trading.
- The level of customer support each Online trading platform broker offers, including their availability, responsiveness, and quality of service.
- Whether each Online trading platform broker offers Micro, Standard, VIP, or Islamic accounts to suit your trading style and preferences.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a Online trading platform broker that best suits your needs and preferences for Online trading platform. Our Online trading platform broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Top 15 Online Trading Platform of 2026 compared
Here are the top Online Trading Platform.
Compare Online trading platform brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a Online trading platform broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your Online trading platform needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are Online trading platform. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more Online trading platform that accept Online trading platform clients.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
SpreadEx
|
EasyMarkets
|
FXPro
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||||||||||
| Regulation | International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd | RoboForex Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Belize under licence No. 000138/32, under the Securities Industry Act 2021, RoboForex Ltd is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also RoboForex Ltd is a participant of the Financial Commission Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076, eToro (ME) Limited (ADGM) Abu Dhabi (UAE) number 220073, eToro (Europe) Ltd (AMF) Autorité des marchés financiers as a digital assets provider France | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157) XTB Limited, CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority XTB MENA Limited licensed 8 July 2021), FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles license number SD148), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority XTB Africa (Pty) Ltd licensed 10 August 2021), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego Polish Financial Supervision Authority) | Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) (49976) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/27) XM Global Limited, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1574), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) / Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd (branch authorisation), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) Ava Trade Markets Ltd (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Authority (ISA) ATrade Ltd (514666577), Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC 0261 of 2024), Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada through Friedberg Direct (IIROC) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (SD 130) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835), licence in Ireland as remote bookmaker for fixed odds betting licence number 1016176 | Easy Forex Trading Ltd is regulated by CySEC (License 079/07). This is the only entity that onboards EU clients. easyMarkets Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC (AFS License 246566), EF Worldwide Ltd (Seychelles) is regulated by FSA (License SD056), EF Worldwide Ltd (British Virgin Islands) is regulated by FSC (License SIBA/L/20/1135), EF Worldwide (PTY) Ltd is regulated by FSCA (License 54018) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) |
| Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | No minimum deposit | 25 | 100 |
| Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 40,000,000+ | 2,000,000+ | 15,000,000+ | 830,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 60,000+ | 250,000+ | 11,200,000+ |
| Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) |
| Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with etoro |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with fxpro |
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 52% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 69% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.48% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 57% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | 62% of retail CFD accounts lose money | 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider |
| Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
eToro Demo |
XTB Demo |
XM Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
FxPro Demo |
| Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, TR | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, CA, IR |
All Online trading platform in more detail
You can compare Online Trading Platform ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top Online Trading Platform for 2026 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top Online trading platform below.
Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Table of Contents
- Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Explained
- 6 Factors to Consider when Choosing Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk
- Are Your Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Trusted And Established?
- Are The Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk World Leading?
- What are the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Commissions and Fees?
- What are the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Funding and Withdrawl Methods?
- Find Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk with Round-the-clock support?
- Make sure the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Offer Comprehensive Trader resources?
- Why Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk needs to be regulated?
- Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk FAQ
- What are the best Online trading platform brokers?
- What is the best Online trading platform broker?
- Related Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Reviews
- Related Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Alternatives
- Related Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Comparisons
Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Explained
Trading volatile financial markets with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk can be challenging, even for experienced traders. In addition to the online educational resources available, traders should consider the platform offered by Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk to ensure a successful trading experience.
Selecting Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk at the forefront of innovation and considered an industry leader is crucial. Doing so will ensure you are equipped with the tools and features to navigate volatile Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk markets effectively.
Reliability is key to gaining access to financial markets. Look for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk that you can rely on to provide a stable and secure trading environment, allowing you to execute trades with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk confidently.
6 Factors to Consider when Choosing Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk
Follow these five rules for selecting Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk that are right for you:
Are Your Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Trusted And Established?
Search for a reputable Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk with a extensive proven track record for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk, enabling you to focus solely on implementing your trading strategy and navigating the markets with confidence. The top rated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk broker is IC Markets. Established in 2007, and in operation for 19 years IC Markets have a head office in Australia.
IC Markets is regulated. This means IC Markets are supervised by and is checked for conduct by International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd regulatory bodies.
Another top rated broker is Roboforex.
Roboforex was established 2009, and in operation for 17 years Roboforex have a head office in Belize.
Roboforex is regulated. This means Roboforex are supervised by and is checked for conduct by International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd regulatory bodies.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Established | 2007 | 2009 | 2007 | 2002 | 2009 | 2010 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Head Office | Australia | Belize | Cyprus, UK | Poland | Cyprus | Australia | Ireland | Australia |
| Regulation | International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd | RoboForex Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Belize under licence No. 000138/32, under the Securities Industry Act 2021, RoboForex Ltd is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also RoboForex Ltd is a participant of the Financial Commission Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076, eToro (ME) Limited (ADGM) Abu Dhabi (UAE) number 220073, eToro (Europe) Ltd (AMF) Autorité des marchés financiers as a digital assets provider France | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157) XTB Limited, CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority XTB MENA Limited licensed 8 July 2021), FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles license number SD148), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority XTB Africa (Pty) Ltd licensed 10 August 2021), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego Polish Financial Supervision Authority) | Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) (49976) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/27) XM Global Limited, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1574), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) / Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd (branch authorisation), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) Ava Trade Markets Ltd (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Authority (ISA) ATrade Ltd (514666577), Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC 0261 of 2024), Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada through Friedberg Direct (IIROC) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (SD 130) |
| Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 40,000,000+ | 2,000,000+ | 15,000,000+ | 830,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ |
| Negative balance protection | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Guaranteed Stop Loss | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| Learn More | Visit IC Markets | Visit Roboforex | Visit eToro | Visit XTB | Visit XM | Visit Pepperstone | Visit AvaTrade | Visit FP Markets |
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 52% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 69% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.48% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 57% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits |
Are The Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk World Leading?
Opt for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk that set themselves apart as an industry leader by actively embracing innovation. Take IC Markets as an example, which is renowned for Segregates clients funds and boasts an extensive array of 2850 tradable instruments. Moreover, IC Markets caters to the needs of its clients with both an online trading platform and a mobile application, making it incredibly convenient to access the markets from anywhere, at any time.
In addition, the IC Markets platform enables access to a variety of financial markets worldwide. IC Markets is a world-leader when it comes to innovation and they are always looking at ways to improve and to maintain their competitive advantage.
Another good choice when looking for Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk is Roboforex. Roboforex Segregates clients funds and offers over 12000 instruments.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruments Available | 2850 | 12000 | 7000 | 10900 | 1464 | 2700 | 1250 | 10000 |
| Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) |
| Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, AU, CA, JP, KR, KP, SG, MU, IL, TR, IN, PK, BA, ET, UG, CU, SY, BD, NG, ID, BE, LY, MO, KE, YE, VU, GY, CD, CG, AF, LA, MZ, IQ, IR | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ |
| Forex pairs offered | 65 | 40 | 65 | 69 | 55 | 93 | 53 | 70 |
| Major forex pairs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Minor forex pairs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Exotic forex pairs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cryptocurrencies (availability subject to regulation) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Commodities Offered | 28 | 100 | 67 | 27 | 8 | 40 | 19 | 29 |
| Metals | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Energies | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Agricultural | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Stocks Offered | 2100 | 8484 | 7246 | 6617 | 1350 | 1100 | 647 | 10000 |
| UK Shares | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| US Shares | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| German Shares | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Japanese Shares | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What are the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Commissions and Fees?
Ensure that your broker is transparent with fees and those dues are competitive.
The best rated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk broker IC Markets offers competitive offers for Forex, CFDs, Spread Betting, Share dealing, Cryptocurrencies. IC Markets minimum deposit is 200.
Another top rated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk broker Roboforex offers Forex, CFDs. Roboforex minimum deposit is 10. Please note that any cryptocurrency availability with any broker is subject to regulation.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| Withdrawl Fees | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| CFD Commission Fees | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
What are the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Funding and Withdrawal Methods?
Efficient and hassle-free funding and withdrawal facilities can significantly improve your overall trading experience when dealing with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk. It streamlines the trading process and helps you focus on making informed decisions rather than worrying about deposit and withdrawal matters with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank transfer | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Cards | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paypal | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Payoneer | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Neteller | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Find Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk with Round-the-clock support?
Effective customer service is an essential factor to consider when dealing with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.
Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk customer service entails various support services to aid customers in making the most cost-effective and appropriate use of the brokers' services.
The customer support options offered by Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk can include phone answering services, live chat support, and email customer service support.
IC Markets support a wide range of languages including English, Japanese, Chinese, Polish, Afrikans, Danish, Dutch, German and more
Roboforex support a wide range of languages including English, Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Indonesian, Malaysian, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Arabic, Thai, Russian, and Ukrainian
IC Markets and Roboforex offer support where clients are able to call or contact the helpdesk via email or a chat service.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Languages | English, Japanese, Chinese, Polish, Afrikans, Danish, Dutch, German and more | English, Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Indonesian, Malaysian, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Arabic, Thai, Russian, and Ukrainian | English, German, Spanish, French, Italian | English, Spanish, Czech, Chinese, German, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovenian, and Turkish | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish | English, Spanish, Portuguese, Thai, Russian, Italian, French, German, Polish, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Arabic | Arabic, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Indonesian, Japanese, Mongolian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Malay, Korean and Turkish | English, Arabic, Indonesian, Italian, Spanish, French, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, German, Portuguese, Thai, French, Malay, Greek, Vietnamese, Romanian, Turkish, Slovenian, Dutch, Polish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish, Serbian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Galician, Estonian, Danish, Czech, Croatian, Bulgarian, Basque |
| Learn More | Visit IC Markets | Visit Roboforex | Visit eToro | Visit XTB | Visit XM | Visit Pepperstone | Visit AvaTrade | Visit FP Markets |
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 52% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 69% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.48% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 57% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits |
Make sure the Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk Offer Comprehensive Trader resources?
It's important to ensure your Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk provide complimentary resources such as analysis, education, and risk management tools. IC Markets and Roboforex collaborate with top analysts to bring the most up-to-date news and insights to traders.
Sound risk and money management are vital to financial market navigation with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk. However, selecting the best broker to access the markets is a critical step that traders should not overlook as they embark on trading live financial markets with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.
Why Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk needs to be regulated?
Regulated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk lowers your risk of loss of deposited trading funds.
Lowering your risk is one of the benefits of working with a properly regulated Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk.
Consumers are protected by Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk regulation, critical to preventing inadequate services and potential financial harm.
Regulation of Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk is necessary to prevent fraud. The Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk working capital and client-funded accounts must be kept separate to avoid conducting business with client funds. Any fraudulent behaviour with Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk is monitored by financial regulators in the jurisdictions brokers are allowed to operate.
Dealing Desk vs Non Dealing Desk List
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading CentralCustomer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), WindowsCustomer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
eToro is a multi-asset platform which offers both investing in stocks and cryptoassets, as well as trading CFDs.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 52% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
This communication is intended for information and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
Copy Trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
Crypto investments are risky and may not suit retail investors; you could lose your entire investment. Understand the risks here.
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, WebCustomer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play)Customer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile AppsCustomer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account XM Swap-Free account (XM Ultra Low Account) VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play)Customer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account Pro Account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play)Customer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play)Customer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingViewCustomer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5Customer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Funding methods
Bank transfer Credit Card PaypalPlatforms
MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play)Customer support
Live chat Phone support Email supportAccount Types
Micro account Standard account ECN accountIslamic account VIP account
Learn more
Losses can exceed deposits
Losses can exceed deposits