We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading CFD.

As someone who has traded both CFDs (Contracts for Difference) and stocks, I have learned that while they are often compared, they suit very different trading goals. For example, when Nvidia slipped from $190 to $185 last week after AMD secured a major artificial intelligence chip partnership in early 2026, holding the physical stock meant I absorbed the full downside move in my portfolio. With CFD trading, I was able to open a short position within minutes and capture that same five dollar move as a profit opportunity instead of a loss. That flexibility has become even more valuable in 2026 as technology stocks continue to react sharply to artificial intelligence announcements and semiconductor supply updates.
This year I have also noticed how interest rate expectations and central bank policy statements have created fast intraday volatility. When the Federal Reserve signaled that rates may stay higher for longer in the first quarter of 2026, growth stocks pulled back quickly. Owning shares meant waiting for a longer term recovery, but using index CFDs on the NASDAQ allowed me to hedge exposure almost instantly. In another example, energy markets surged after fresh supply concerns in the Middle East pushed oil prices higher. Trading commodity CFDs gave me short term exposure without having to purchase futures contracts directly.
Another major development in 2026 has been the continued expansion of retail access to global markets. Many brokers now offer fractional share investing alongside leveraged CFD accounts. From personal experience, this makes it easier to separate long term investment positions in companies like Nvidia or Apple from short term speculative trades executed through CFDs. The tools available today allow traders to switch between ownership and speculation depending on market conditions.
These recent market events reinforced something important for me. Stocks are better suited for long term wealth building, dividend income, and benefiting from company growth over time. CFDs are better suited for short term trading, hedging, and taking advantage of both rising and falling markets. By understanding how each reacts during real world events in 2026, you can decide which approach aligns best with your risk tolerance and overall investment strategy.
If I buy Nvidia stock at $165 and it climbs to $185 after strong artificial intelligence earnings guidance in 2026, I make $20 per share as a shareholder. If the company later announces a dividend, I may also receive a cash payout depending on eligibility.
With a Nvidia CFD, I can trade that same $20 price movement without owning the underlying shares. If I open a leveraged CFD position controlling $16,500 worth of Nvidia with $1,650 margin at 10 percent leverage, a $20 upward move would generate approximately $2,000 in profit. However, if Nvidia falls from $165 to $145, that same leverage would magnify losses just as quickly. This highlights how leverage increases both opportunity and risk.

In early 2026, the NASDAQ 100 index traded around 18,200 points before pulling back to 17,700 points following renewed interest rate concerns and profit taking in major technology stocks. Holding an exchange traded fund that tracks the NASDAQ meant waiting for a recovery over time.
Using a NASDAQ CFD, I was able to short the index and benefit from the 500 point decline. With leverage, even a modest margin deposit allowed exposure to the full index movement. While this flexibility can be powerful during volatile market conditions, it requires strict risk management to avoid amplified losses.
These 2026 examples show how stocks provide ownership and long term growth potential, while CFDs offer flexibility to trade both rising and falling markets with smaller capital outlay but higher risk exposure.
Owning stocks gives me real benefits. When I bought Coca Cola at $58 and it rose to $61, I also received dividend payouts. With CFDs, there are no shareholder rights or dividends. The benefit is flexibility: I can profit from both rising and falling prices.
I use stocks for long term wealth. For instance, I held Amazon shares from $100 to $130 and enjoyed steady growth. CFDs are my tool for short term speculation. Recently, oil jumped from $82 to $86 per barrel after an OPEC Plus announcement. That quick move suited CFDs perfectly.
CFDs simplify short selling. When Nvidia fell from $190 to $185 after AMD’s news, I shorted a CFD and made a quick profit. Doing the same with actual shares would have required borrowing stock and facing restrictions. This flexibility is why I use CFDs for volatile events like earnings announcements.

In my own trading, stocks form the foundation of my portfolio for stability and dividends. CFDs are my tactical tool for short term opportunities, whether it is an Nvidia earnings surprise, Tesla delivery news, or oil price shocks. If you want long term growth, stocks are the safer choice. If you prefer fast market action and can manage risk, CFDs offer more flexibility.
Both have a place in a diversified trading strategy. I use stocks to build wealth steadily and CFDs to stay active during fast moving global events.
| Features | CFD Trading | Real Stocks |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Assets | No. CFDs are derivative contracts where traders speculate on price movements without owning the underlying asset. | Yes. You directly own shares of the company and become a shareholder. |
| Leverage | Yes. Leverage allows larger exposure with a smaller margin deposit, depending on regulation. | No for standard accounts. Full payment is required unless using a margin account. |
| Risk Level | High due to leverage and short term market volatility. | Varies from moderate to high depending on the company, sector, and strategy. |
| Potential Losses | Losses can exceed margin in some jurisdictions. Many regulated brokers provide negative balance protection for retail clients. | Losses are limited to the amount invested unless trading on margin. |
| Capital Outlay | Requires only a margin deposit, which is a fraction of the total trade size. | Requires full payment of the stock price unless trading on margin. |
| Market Access | No direct exchange access. CFDs are over the counter contracts with a broker that track the underlying asset price. | Yes. Stocks are traded directly on regulated exchanges such as NYSE or NASDAQ. |
| Tradable Assets | Wide range including stocks, indices, forex, commodities, cryptocurrencies, ETFs, and bonds depending on broker offering. | Stocks, ETFs, REITs, bonds, and mutual funds depending on broker access. |
| Fees and Costs | Spreads, overnight financing fees, and sometimes commissions. | Brokerage commissions, exchange fees, and possible custody or account maintenance fees. |
| Overnight Financing | Yes. Positions held overnight typically incur swap or financing charges. | No financing fees unless using margin borrowing. |
| Market Hours | Nearly 24 hours a day during the trading week for most markets. Some brokers offer weekend cryptocurrency trading. | Limited to official exchange trading hours, for example 9:30 am to 4:00 pm Eastern Time for US markets. |
| Shareholder Privileges | No voting rights or shareholder privileges. | Yes. Includes voting rights, participation in annual meetings, and access to company reports. |
| Dividend Rights | No direct dividends. Brokers may apply dividend adjustments to open positions. | Yes. Shareholders receive dividends if declared by the company. |
| Short Selling | Yes. It is simple to trade both rising and falling markets. | More complex. Requires a margin account and may be restricted depending on regulations and share availability. |
| Margin Calls | Yes. Positions may be automatically closed if margin requirements are not maintained. | Only applicable if trading on margin. |
| Counterparty Risk | Yes. You face broker counterparty risk because CFDs are contracts with the broker. | Lower. Shares are held in custody and traded on regulated exchanges. |
| Expiry Dates | No expiry date for most share CFDs. Positions can be held as long as margin requirements are met. | No expiry date. Stocks can be held indefinitely. |
| Trading Strategy Suitability | Best suited for short term trading, speculation, and hedging existing portfolios. | Best suited for long term investing, wealth building, and dividend income strategies. |
| Tax Treatment | Profits may be taxed as capital gains or income depending on jurisdiction. | Capital gains tax and dividend tax apply depending on local tax laws. |
| Liquidity | Depends on the liquidity of the underlying market and the broker’s pricing model. | Depends on exchange and company size. Large cap stocks are typically highly liquid. |
| Regulation | Brokers are regulated by financial authorities such as FCA, CySEC, or ASIC. Protection levels vary by jurisdiction. | Highly regulated exchanges with established investor protection frameworks. |

Let’s imagine you have $10,000 available and want to trade NVIDIA stock, currently priced at $188.00 per share in early 2026. We will compare what happens if you use your money to buy the stock directly versus trading it through a CFD (Contract for Difference). This comparison shows both potential gains and risks if the price moves in your favor or against you.
If you invest your full $10,000 into NVIDIA at $188.00 per share, you can purchase approximately 53 shares (10,000 ÷ 188 = 53.19, rounded down to 53 shares). Suppose the price rises by 10% to $206.80. Your 53 shares would then be worth approximately $10,960 (53 × 206.80), giving you a profit of about $960 before fees.
However, if the price falls by 10% to $169.20, your 53 shares would be worth approximately $8,968, resulting in a loss of about $1,032. With real stocks, your losses are limited to the amount you invested unless you are trading on margin. You also retain shareholder rights such as dividends if declared and voting rights.
Now consider the same trade using CFDs with 10:1 leverage. Instead of paying the full $10,000, you only need to deposit $1,000 as margin to control approximately $10,000 worth of NVIDIA exposure. If NVIDIA rises by 10% to $206.80, the total position increases by about $1,000. Since your initial margin was $1,000, this represents roughly a 100% return on your capital before fees and financing costs.
However, leverage magnifies losses as well. If NVIDIA falls by 10% to $169.20, the position loses about $1,000, which would wipe out your entire margin. In regulated regions such as the United Kingdom, European Union, and Australia, retail traders typically have negative balance protection, meaning losses cannot exceed deposited funds. In other jurisdictions, losses may exceed your initial margin if the market moves sharply and risk controls are not in place.
With stocks, you gain slower but steadier returns and retain shareholder benefits. With CFDs, profits can be magnified quickly due to leverage, but the risk of losing your entire margin or more, is much higher. Therefore, CFDs are generally better suited for short term traders comfortable with higher risk, while buying stocks is more suitable for long term investors looking for stability and ownership.

Contracts for Difference (CFDs) allow you to speculate on the price movement of NVIDIA stock without actually owning the shares. With CFD trading, you can use leverage, meaning you only need to put down a fraction of the total trade value.
Both CFD trading and traditional stock trading offer opportunities and risks. CFD trading allows for potentially higher returns through leverage but comes with increased risk and the possibility of margin calls. Traditional stock trading is more straightforward, with ownership of actual shares, but without the amplified gains or losses from leverage.
Suppose NVIDIA stock rises to $198.00:
With leverage, your return on the initial $10,000 investment is 51.38% ($5,138.00 ÷ $10,000).
Suppose NVIDIA stock falls to $178.00:
With leverage, your loss on the initial $10,000 investment is 54.82% ($5,482.00 ÷ $10,000).

Contracts for Difference (CFDs) provide traders with flexibility and access to leverage, but they also come with a higher level of risk compared to traditional stock trading. Understanding these risks is essential before engaging in CFD trading.
The biggest advantage of CFDs leverage is also its most significant risk. While leverage allows traders to control large positions with a small deposit, it also magnifies potential losses. A small unfavorable move in the market can quickly lead to substantial losses, sometimes exceeding the initial deposit.
CFDs are often used to trade highly volatile instruments such as forex, commodities, or tech stocks. Rapid price fluctuations can cause positions to be liquidated unexpectedly, particularly if stop loss orders are not in place. This volatility makes CFDs more suitable for experienced traders who can manage fast moving markets.
When trading CFDs, you enter into an agreement directly with your broker. This introduces counterparty risk, meaning your ability to close trades or withdraw profits depends on the broker’s reliability. Trading with a regulated broker reduces this risk but does not eliminate it entirely.
Unlike traditional stock ownership, holding CFD positions overnight typically incurs financing charges. These costs, combined with spreads and commissions, can eat into profits especially for longer term trades. Traders must account for these expenses when planning their strategies.
The fast pace of CFD trading and the temptation of high leverage can lead to emotional decision making. Many traders overtrade or chase losses, which increases the likelihood of poor outcomes. Discipline and strict risk management are critical to mitigating this challenge.

With traditional stock trading, you purchase actual shares of NVIDIA and own them outright. This ownership comes with potential benefits such as dividends, voting rights, and the ability to hold the asset long term. Unlike CFDs, there is no leverage involved, so your profits and losses are directly tied to the stock’s price movement.
Suppose NVIDIA stock rises to $210.00 in 2026:
Your return on the initial $10,000 investment is approximately 9.20% ($920.00 ÷ $10,000).
Suppose NVIDIA stock falls to $170.00:

Your loss on the initial $10,000 investment is approximately 11.60% ($1,160.00 ÷ $10,000).

From my own trading over the past year, I’ve learned that while traditional stock trading is more stable compared to CFDs, it’s not without its pitfalls. The markets have shown me how fast things can change, even with the biggest companies.
The most obvious challenge I’ve faced is market risk. For instance, I bought NVIDIA shares at about $118, right after the 10 for 1 stock split in June 2024. Within weeks, news about tighter U.S. export restrictions on chips to China pushed the price back toward $105. Even with record breaking AI demand, the broader geopolitical news dragged the stock down. That taught me no stock, no matter how strong, is safe from global events. Fast forward to early 2026, NVIDIA has traded closer to the $185 to $195 range as AI infrastructure spending accelerated again, yet volatility remains high whenever new semiconductor regulations or supply chain concerns emerge.
Liquidity usually isn’t an issue with mega caps like Apple or Microsoft, but I’ve seen exceptions. After the September 2024 Fed rate hike, I tried to sell Apple after hours. During market hours it traded near $189, but in the after hours session the best I could sell for was $185. When trading volume thins out, especially around major announcements, spreads widen, and you’re forced to sell below what you expected. In 2026, similar liquidity gaps have appeared around inflation data releases and Federal Reserve commentary, even though Apple has recently traded above the $200 level during strong earnings periods.
Another painful lesson came from company specific risk. Tesla reported weaker than expected Q4 2024 deliveries in January 2025, and the stock dropped almost 15% in a week, falling from around $265 to just above $225. I held some shares through that drop, and it reminded me that even the most hyped companies are vulnerable to sudden earnings shocks and leadership decisions. In 2026, Tesla has continued to show sharp swings around delivery numbers and pricing adjustments, at times trading back above the $300 range before pulling back again on margin pressure concerns.
I also ran into opportunity cost. In mid 2024, I had about $5,000 sitting in Meta stock at $250. While I was waiting for it to recover, Bitcoin jumped from $20,000 in early 2024 to almost $40,000 by year end. Holding Meta wasn’t a bad choice, but compared to what I could’ve gained in crypto, it felt like a missed chance. That’s the reality sometimes safe feels like slow. By 2026, Bitcoin has traded above the $60,000 level during renewed institutional inflows, while Meta has also rallied significantly from its 2024 levels, proving that patience can pay off but timing still matters.

Yes CFDs carry much higher risk than stocks, and my experiences in 2024 really proved that. The reason is leverage: it turns small market moves into big swings in your account. That reality has not changed in 2026, especially during periods of sharp volatility tied to interest rate expectations and geopolitical headlines.
For example, I opened a CFD on Apple with just 10% collateral. Apple fell around 8% after disappointing iPhone sales numbers in late 2024, and that nearly wiped out my margin. If I had bought the shares outright at $170, it would’ve just been a manageable 8% loss, not a margin call. Even in 2026, when Apple trades well above those 2024 levels, short term earnings reactions still create similar leveraged risks for CFD traders.
In mid 2024, when oil prices spiked above $95 a barrel after Middle East tensions, many CFD traders betting against oil saw their accounts blown up overnight. Some even owed more than their deposits. In 2026, oil has traded closer to the $70 to $80 range amid global supply adjustments, but sudden geopolitical flare ups continue to create overnight gaps that can severely impact leveraged CFD positions.
Leverage has been the biggest difference for me between CFDs and stocks. It creates opportunities, but also risks that can spiral fast. That dynamic has remained clear through the volatile conditions seen in 2026.
High Exposure with Less Capital: In October 2024, I used $1,000 margin with 10:1 leverage to take a $10,000 position on the S&P 500. A 1% move in the index made me the same as if I had invested ten grand directly. That’s the appeal control big exposure with small money. In 2026, similar setups around major economic announcements have shown how quickly gains and losses can accumulate within hours.
Amplified Profits and Losses: But in December 2024, when gold dropped from $2,450 to $2,400, my 20:1 leveraged CFD turned that small 2% dip into a 40% loss on my account. Losses snowball quickly, and that’s when I realized leverage is a double edged sword. In 2026, gold has fluctuated around the $2,300 to $2,500 range depending on inflation data and central bank buying, reinforcing how leveraged positions can quickly magnify even modest price swings.
Full Payment in Cash: Buying shares directly is far simpler. In early 2025, I picked up $5,000 worth of Microsoft at $310. That’s my full exposure if it drops, the most I lose is $5,000, not more. That makes me sleep better at night. By 2026, Microsoft has traded above the $380 range during strong cloud earnings growth, highlighting how long term ownership can benefit from sustained corporate performance.
Margin Accounts: My broker does offer 2:1 margin on stocks, so I could buy $10,000 worth with $5,000. But that’s still nothing compared to the 10:1 or 20:1 leverage that CFDs give. Stock leverage feels like a safer middle ground.
After trading both, I’d say CFDs are far riskier, especially in volatile times like the Fed’s September 2024 hike, Tesla’s January 2025 delivery shock, or the inflation driven swings seen in 2026. Stocks let you hold through the noise; CFDs can close you out before the market even recovers.

At this point, I’ve accepted that the choice between CFDs and stocks depends on your style and goals. I use them differently now.
I trade CFDs only when I see fast opportunities. For example, during the crude oil swings in October 2024, I shorted CFDs and made a quick gain overnight. Similar fast moves have continued into 2026, especially after renewed Middle East supply tensions pushed oil back above $70 per barrel earlier this year. CFDs let you act on those short bursts, and you can profit on both rising and falling prices. During the January 2026 market volatility triggered by unexpected tariff announcements, I used index CFDs to hedge quickly rather than selling long term positions. But with leverage, I keep my position sizes small and stops tight, or the market takes back more than it gives.
For the long game, I stick with stocks. My Apple shares from 2022 at $150 are now trading above $200, and I’ve collected dividends too. In fact, Apple has continued trading well above that level in 2026, supported by strong services revenue and artificial intelligence integration across its product line. Owning the actual shares lets me ride out volatility, even when markets react sharply to Federal Reserve policy decisions or technology sector competition. My losses are limited to what I invest, which makes this approach better suited for building wealth gradually over time.
These days, I use a blend. My core portfolio is stocks for long term stability, while CFDs are for short term speculation when markets move fast, such as during Federal Reserve rate announcements in 2026 or sudden semiconductor industry headlines affecting companies like Nvidia and AMD. If you want steady growth and peace of mind, stocks make more sense. If you are comfortable with volatility and disciplined risk management, CFDs can provide flexibility. The key is understanding the tool you are using and matching it to your risk tolerance and overall investment strategy.
After weighing the pros and cons of both CFDs and stocks, I find that the right choice depends entirely on what I want to achieve as a trader. CFDs give me speed, leverage, and the chance to profit from short term market moves, but they also expose me to much higher risk. Without strict risk management, it’s easy to lose more than I initially planned. For me, CFDs are useful tools when I want to take advantage of short bursts of volatility or hedge against an existing position.
On the other hand, stocks give me a sense of stability and ownership. Holding shares of a company like NVIDIA means I benefit not only from capital appreciation but potentially from dividends as well. While the returns are usually slower compared to leveraged CFD trades, the risk is more controlled, and I know my maximum loss is limited to my investment. For long term portfolio growth, stocks fit me much better.
Personally, I use a balanced approach: I keep stocks as the foundation of my investments while occasionally trading CFDs to capture short term opportunities. This way, I can enjoy the security of ownership with stocks while still having the flexibility and excitement that CFDs provide. When all is said and done, whether a trader chooses CFDs, stocks, or a mix of both, it comes down to aligning their trading style with their risk appetite and financial goals.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Cfd Vs Stock to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Cfd Vs Stock. Below we shortlist what we think are the best CFD brokers after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Cfd Vs Stock.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online CFD trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade CFD more confidently.
Selecting the right online CFD trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for CFD trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our CFD brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a CFD broker that best suits your needs and preferences for CFD. Our CFD broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top CFD Brokers.
Compare CFD brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a CFD broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your CFD needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are CFD brokers. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more CFD brokers that accept CFD clients.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
EasyMarkets
|
SpreadEx
|
FXPro
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||||||||||
| Regulation | International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd | RoboForex Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Belize under licence No. 000138/32, under the Securities Industry Act 2021, RoboForex Ltd is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also RoboForex Ltd is a participant of the Financial Commission Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076, eToro (ME) Limited (ADGM) Abu Dhabi (UAE) number 220073, eToro (Europe) Ltd (AMF) Autorité des marchés financiers as a digital assets provider France | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157) XTB Limited, CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority XTB MENA Limited licensed 8 July 2021), FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles license number SD148), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority XTB Africa (Pty) Ltd licensed 10 August 2021), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego Polish Financial Supervision Authority) | Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) (49976) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/27) XM Global Limited, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1574), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) / Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd (branch authorisation), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) Ava Trade Markets Ltd (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Authority (ISA) ATrade Ltd (514666577), Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC 0261 of 2024), Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada through Friedberg Direct (IIROC) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (SD 130) | Easy Forex Trading Ltd is regulated by CySEC (License 079/07). This is the only entity that onboards EU clients. easyMarkets Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC (AFS License 246566), EF Worldwide Ltd (Seychelles) is regulated by FSA (License SD056), EF Worldwide Ltd (British Virgin Islands) is regulated by FSC (License SIBA/L/20/1135), EF Worldwide (PTY) Ltd is regulated by FSCA (License 54018) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835), licence in Ireland as remote bookmaker for fixed odds betting licence number 1016176 | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) |
| Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | 25 | No minimum deposit | 100 |
| Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 40,000,000+ | 2,000,000+ | 15,000,000+ | 830,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 250,000+ | 60,000+ | 11,200,000+ |
| Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) |
| Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with etoro |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Sign
Up with fxpro |
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 50% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 70% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.48% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 72-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 57% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 62% of retail CFD accounts lose money | 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider |
| Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
eToro Demo |
XTB Demo |
XM Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
FxPro Demo |
| Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, TR | US, CA, IR |
You can compare CFD Brokers ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top CFD Brokers for 2026 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top CFD brokers below.
eToro is a multi-asset platform which offers both investing in stocks and cryptoassets, as well as trading CFDs.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 50% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
This communication is intended for information and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
Copy Trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
Crypto investments are risky and may not suit retail investors; you could lose your entire investment. Understand the risks here.
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.
Losses can exceed deposits