We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading CFD.

As someone who has traded both CFDs (Contracts for Difference) and stocks, I have learned that while they are often compared, they suit very different trading goals. For example, when Nvidia slipped from $190 to $185 last week after AMD secured an OpenAI chip deal, holding the stock meant I felt the loss directly. With CFD trading, I could short the market and turn that same move into a profit. In this guide I share how CFDs and stocks differ, real price examples, and recent market events. By the end, you will know which one fits your investment strategy.
Stocks mean direct ownership of a company. If I buy Tesla at $450 and it rises to $470, I gain $20 per share plus possible dividends. In contrast, CFDs are speculative contracts with no ownership rights. With a Tesla CFD, the same $20 move is settled in cash but without voting rights or dividends. This makes CFDs ideal for flexible short term trading while stocks are better for long term investors.
CFD trading with leverage allows me to control a large position with a small deposit. For example, I controlled £10,000 worth of Apple with only £1,000 margin at 10 percent leverage. When Apple rose from £150 to £160, I earned £660, a 66 percent return on my margin. With stocks I would have needed to pay the full £9,900 upfront. This makes CFDs high risk high reward, while stocks are safer but capital intensive.
Owning stocks gives me real benefits. When I bought Coca Cola at $58 and it rose to $61, I also received dividend payouts. With CFDs, there are no shareholder rights or dividends. The benefit is flexibility: I can profit from both rising and falling prices.
I use stocks for long term wealth. For instance, I held Amazon shares from $100 to $130 and enjoyed steady growth. CFDs are my tool for short term speculation. Recently, oil jumped from $82 to $86 per barrel after an OPEC Plus announcement. That quick move suited CFDs perfectly.
CFDs simplify short selling. When Nvidia fell from $190 to $185 after AMD’s news, I shorted a CFD and made a quick profit. Doing the same with actual shares would have required borrowing stock and facing restrictions. This flexibility is why I use CFDs for volatile events like earnings announcements.
In my own trading, stocks form the foundation of my portfolio for stability and dividends. CFDs are my tactical tool for short term opportunities, whether it is an Nvidia earnings surprise, Tesla delivery news, or oil price shocks. If you want long term growth, stocks are the safer choice. If you prefer fast market action and can manage risk, CFDs offer more flexibility.
Both have a place in a diversified trading strategy. I use stocks to build wealth steadily and CFDs to stay active during fast moving global events.
| Features | CFD Trading | Real Stocks | 
|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Assets | No – CFDs are derivative contracts where traders speculate on price movements without owning the asset. | Yes – you directly own shares of the company and become a shareholder. | 
| Leverage | Yes, high leverage is available, allowing larger exposure with a smaller deposit. | No, you must pay the full value of the stock upfront (unless using margin accounts). | 
| Risk Level | High, leverage amplifies both profits and losses; market volatility can increase risk. | Medium, risks are limited to market performance and the amount invested. | 
| Potential Losses | Losses may exceed your deposited amount if markets move against you significantly. | Losses are capped at the amount invested in the stock. | 
| Capital Outlay | Requires only a margin deposit (fraction of trade size). | Requires full payment of stock price unless trading on margin. | 
| Direct Market Access | Yes, CFDs mirror underlying asset prices. | Yes, stocks are traded directly on exchanges. | 
| Tradable Assets | Wide range, Stocks, Indices, Forex, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies, ETFs, Bonds. | Primarily stocks, ETFs, and some indices depending on the broker. | 
| Fees & Costs | Spreads, overnight financing (swap) fees, and sometimes commissions. | Brokerage commissions, exchange fees, and custody/maintenance fees. | 
| Market Hours | Nearly 24/5 for most CFDs, with some markets offering weekend trading on cryptocurrencies. | Regular stock exchange hours (e.g., 9:30 am – 4:00 pm EST for NYSE/NASDAQ). | 
| Shareholder Privileges | No, traders do not own voting rights or privileges in the company. | Yes, includes voting rights, annual meeting participation, and reports access. | 
| Voting Rights | No | Yes, depending on the number of shares owned. | 
| Dividend Rights | No direct dividends, but some brokers adjust CFD positions to reflect dividend payouts (dividend adjustments). | Yes, shareholders receive dividends if declared by the company. | 
| Short Selling | Yes, easy to trade both rising and falling markets. | More complex, requires margin accounts and may be restricted in some markets. | 
| Expiry Dates | No expiry date, CFD positions can be held as long as margin requirements are met. | No expiry date, stocks can be held indefinitely. | 
| Trading Strategy Suitability | Best for day trading, short term speculation, and hedging existing portfolios. | Best for long term investing, wealth building, and dividend income strategies. | 
| Tax Treatment | Profits may be taxed as capital gains or income depending on jurisdiction. | Capital gains tax and dividend tax apply depending on local tax laws. | 
| Liquidity | High, CFDs are offered on many global markets with instant execution via brokers. | High, depends on stock exchange and company size (large cap stocks are very liquid). | 
| Regulation | Regulated by financial authorities (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC), but riskier due to leverage. | Highly regulated markets with greater investor protections. | 

Let’s imagine you have $10,000 available and want to trade NVIDIA stock, currently priced at $122.34 per share. We will compare what happens if you use your money to buy the stock directly versus trading it through a CFD (Contract for Difference). This comparison will show both potential gains and risks if the price moves in your favor or against you.
If you invest your full $10,000 into NVIDIA at $122.34 per share, you can purchase around 81 shares (10,000 ÷ 122.34). Suppose the price rises by 10% to $134.57. Your shares would then be worth approximately $10,901, giving you a profit of $901 before fees.
However, if the price falls by 10% to $110.11, your shares would be worth only $8,889, leading to a loss of $1,111. Importantly, with real stocks, your losses are limited to the amount you invested, and you retain shareholder rights such as dividends (if issued) and voting rights.
Now consider the same trade with CFDs using 10:1 leverage. Instead of paying the full $10,000, you only need to put up $1,000 as margin to control the same $10,000 exposure in NVIDIA stock. If NVIDIA’s price rises by 10% to $134.57, your CFD position would also increase in value by $1,000. Since your initial margin was only $1,000, that’s a 100% return on your capital.
But leverage works both ways. If the price drops by 10% to $110.11, your CFD position loses $1,000, wiping out your entire margin. In some cases, losses can even exceed your deposit if the market moves sharply against you and stop loss orders are not in place.
With stocks, you gain slower but steadier returns and retain shareholder benefits. With CFDs, profits can be magnified quickly due to leverage, but the risk of losing your entire margin or more, is much higher. Therefore, CFDs are generally better suited for short term traders comfortable with higher risk, while buying stocks is more suitable for long term investors looking for stability and ownership.
Contracts for Difference (CFDs) allow you to speculate on the price movement of NVIDIA stock without actually owning the shares. With CFD trading, you can use leverage, meaning you only need to put down a fraction of the total trade value.
Both CFD trading and traditional stock trading offer opportunities and risks. CFD trading allows for potentially higher returns through leverage but comes with increased risk and the possibility of margin calls. Traditional stock trading is more straightforward, with ownership of actual shares, but without the amplified gains or losses from leverage.
Suppose NVIDIA stock rises to $130.34:
With leverage, your return on the initial $10,000 investment is 66.69% ($6,669.20 ÷ $10,000).
Suppose NVIDIA stock falls to $114.34:
With leverage, your loss on the initial $10,000 investment is 64.23% ($6,422.80 ÷ $10,000).
Contracts for Difference (CFDs) provide traders with flexibility and access to leverage, but they also come with a higher level of risk compared to traditional stock trading. Understanding these risks is essential before engaging in CFD trading.
The biggest advantage of CFDs leverage is also its most significant risk. While leverage allows traders to control large positions with a small deposit, it also magnifies potential losses. A small unfavorable move in the market can quickly lead to substantial losses, sometimes exceeding the initial deposit.
CFDs are often used to trade highly volatile instruments such as forex, commodities, or tech stocks. Rapid price fluctuations can cause positions to be liquidated unexpectedly, particularly if stop loss orders are not in place. This volatility makes CFDs more suitable for experienced traders who can manage fast moving markets.
When trading CFDs, you enter into an agreement directly with your broker. This introduces counterparty risk, meaning your ability to close trades or withdraw profits depends on the broker’s reliability. Trading with a regulated broker reduces this risk but does not eliminate it entirely.
Unlike traditional stock ownership, holding CFD positions overnight typically incurs financing charges. These costs, combined with spreads and commissions, can eat into profits especially for longer term trades. Traders must account for these expenses when planning their strategies.
The fast pace of CFD trading and the temptation of high leverage can lead to emotional decision making. Many traders overtrade or chase losses, which increases the likelihood of poor outcomes. Discipline and strict risk management are critical to mitigating this challenge.

With traditional stock trading, you purchase actual shares of NVIDIA and own them outright. This ownership comes with potential benefits such as dividends, voting rights, and the ability to hold the asset long term. Unlike CFDs, there is no leverage involved, so your profits and losses are directly tied to the stock’s price movement.
Suppose NVIDIA stock rises to $130.34:
Your return on the initial $10,000 investment is 5.59% ($558.54 ÷ $10,000).
Suppose NVIDIA stock falls to $114.34:
Your loss on the initial $10,000 investment is 7.41% ($741.46 ÷ $10,000).
From my own trading over the past year, I’ve learned that while traditional stock trading is more stable compared to CFDs, it’s not without its pitfalls. The markets in 2024 and 2025 have shown me how fast things can change, even with the biggest companies.
The most obvious challenge I’ve faced is market risk. For instance, I bought NVIDIA shares at about $118 earlier this year, right after the 10 for 1 stock split in June 2024. Within weeks, news about tighter U.S. export restrictions on chips to China pushed the price back toward $105. Even with record breaking AI demand, the broader geopolitical news dragged the stock down. That taught me no stock, no matter how strong, is safe from global events.
Liquidity usually isn’t an issue with mega caps like Apple or Microsoft, but I’ve seen exceptions. After the September 2024 Fed rate hike, I tried to sell Apple after hours. During market hours it traded near $189, but in the after hours session the best I could sell for was $185. When trading volume thins out, especially around major announcements, spreads widen, and you’re forced to sell below what you expected.
Another painful lesson came from company specific risk. Tesla reported weaker than expected Q4 2024 deliveries in January 2025, and the stock dropped almost 15% in a week, falling from around $265 to just above $225. I held some shares through that drop, and it reminded me that even the most hyped companies are vulnerable to sudden earnings shocks and leadership decisions.
I also ran into opportunity cost. In mid 2024, I had about $5,000 sitting in Meta stock at $250. While I was waiting for it to recover, Bitcoin jumped from $20,000 in early 2024 to almost $40,000 by year end. Holding Meta wasn’t a bad choice, but compared to what I could’ve gained in crypto, it felt like a missed chance. That’s the reality sometimes “safe” feels like “slow.”

Yes CFDs carry much higher risk than stocks, and my experiences in 2024 really proved that. The reason is leverage: it turns small market moves into big swings in your account.
For example, I opened a CFD on Apple with just 10% collateral. Apple fell around 8% after disappointing iPhone sales numbers in late 2024, and that nearly wiped out my margin. If I had bought the shares outright at $170, it would’ve just been a manageable 8% loss, not a margin call.
In mid 2024, when oil prices spiked above $95 a barrel after Middle East tensions, many CFD traders betting against oil saw their accounts blown up overnight. Some even owed more than their deposits. That’s the harsh reality of CFDs you can lose more than you put in.
Leverage has been the biggest difference for me between CFDs and stocks. It creates opportunities, but also risks that can spiral fast.
High Exposure with Less Capital: In October 2024, I used $1,000 margin with 10:1 leverage to take a $10,000 position on the S&P 500. A 1% move in the index made me the same as if I had invested ten grand directly. That’s the appeal control big exposure with small money.
Amplified Profits and Losses: But in December 2024, when gold dropped from $2,450 to $2,400, my 20:1 leveraged CFD turned that small 2% dip into a 40% loss on my account. Losses snowball quickly, and that’s when I realized leverage is a double edged sword.
Full Payment in Cash: Buying shares directly is far simpler. In early 2025, I picked up $5,000 worth of Microsoft at $310. That’s my full exposure if it drops, the most I lose is $5,000, not more. That makes me sleep better at night.
Margin Accounts: My broker does offer 2:1 margin on stocks, so I could buy $10,000 worth with $5,000. But that’s still nothing compared to the 10:1 or 20:1 leverage that CFDs give. Stock leverage feels like a safer middle ground.
After trading both, I’d say CFDs are far riskier, especially in volatile times like the Fed’s September 2024 hike or Tesla’s January 2025 delivery shock. Stocks let you hold through the noise; CFDs can blow you out before the market even recovers.

At this point, I’ve accepted that the choice between CFDs and stocks depends on your style and goals. I use them differently now.
I trade CFDs only when I see fast opportunities. For example, during the crude oil swings in October 2024, I shorted CFDs and made a quick gain overnight. CFDs let you act on those short bursts, and you can profit on both rising and falling prices. But with leverage, I keep my position sizes small and stops tight, or the market takes back more than it gives.
For the long game, I stick with stocks. My Apple shares from 2022 at $150 are now trading above $200, and I’ve collected dividends too. Owning the actual shares lets me ride out volatility, and my losses are limited to what I invest. That’s perfect for building wealth slowly and steadily.
These days, I use a blend. My core portfolio is stocks for long term stability, while CFDs are for short term speculation when markets move fast (like during Fed meetings or oil shocks). If you want steady growth and sleep better, go for stocks. If you crave action and can handle the pressure, CFDs add excitement but treat them like fire: useful in the right hands, destructive in the wrong ones.
After weighing the pros and cons of both CFDs and stocks, I find that the right choice depends entirely on what I want to achieve as a trader. CFDs give me speed, leverage, and the chance to profit from short term market moves, but they also expose me to much higher risk. Without strict risk management, it’s easy to lose more than I initially planned. For me, CFDs are useful tools when I want to take advantage of short bursts of volatility or hedge against an existing position.
On the other hand, stocks give me a sense of stability and ownership. Holding shares of a company like NVIDIA means I benefit not only from capital appreciation but potentially from dividends as well. While the returns are usually slower compared to leveraged CFD trades, the risk is more controlled, and I know my maximum loss is limited to my investment. For long term portfolio growth, stocks fit me much better.
Personally, I use a balanced approach: I keep stocks as the foundation of my investments while occasionally trading CFDs to capture short term opportunities. This way, I can enjoy the security of ownership with stocks while still having the flexibility and excitement that CFDs provide. Ultimately, whether a trader chooses CFDs, stocks, or a mix of both, it comes down to aligning their trading style with their risk appetite and financial goals.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Cfd Vs Stock to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Cfd Vs Stock. Below we shortlist what we think are the best CFD brokers after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Cfd Vs Stock.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online CFD trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade CFD more confidently.
Selecting the right online CFD trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for CFD trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our CFD brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a CFD broker that best suits your needs and preferences for CFD. Our CFD broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top CFD Brokers.
Compare CFD brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a CFD broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your CFD needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are CFD brokers. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more CFD brokers that accept CFD clients.
| Broker | IC Markets   | Roboforex   | eToro   | XTB   | XM   | Pepperstone   | AvaTrade   | FP Markets   | EasyMarkets   | SpreadEx   | FXPro   | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||||||||||
| Regulation | Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018) | RoboForex Lid is regulated by Belize FSC, License No. 000138/7, reg. number 000001272. RoboForex Ltd, which is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also is a participant of its Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076 | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority), XTB AFRICA (PTY) LTD licensed to operate in South Africa, KPWiG (Polish Securities and Exchange Commission), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority), DIFC (Dubai International Financial Center), CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego), IFSC (Belize International Financial Services Commission license number IFSC/60/413/TS/19) | Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/27) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of the Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ),, FFAJ, Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM)(190018) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) BVI (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Association (ISA) (514666577) ATrade Ltd, Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (130) | Easy Forex Trading Ltd is regulated by CySEC ( License Number 079/07). Easy Forex Trading Ltd is the only entity that onboards EU clients, easyMarkets Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC ( AFS License No. 246566), EF Worldwide Ltd in Seychelles is regulated by FSA ( License Number SD056), EF Worldwide Ltd in British Virgin Islands is regulated by FSC (License Number SIBA/L/20/1135), | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) | 
| Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | 25 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 
| Funding | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 40,000,000+ | 1,000,000+ | 10,000,000+ | 400,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 250,000+ | 60,000+ | 7,800,000+ | 
| Benefits | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Accounts | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | 
| Support | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Learn More | Sign 
			Up with icmarkets | Sign 
			Up with roboforex | Sign 
			Up with etoro | Sign 
			Up with xtb | Sign 
			Up with xm | Sign 
			Up with pepperstone | Sign 
			Up with avatrade | Sign 
			Up with fpmarkets | Sign 
			Up with easymarkets | Sign 
			Up with spreadex | Sign 
			Up with fxpro | 
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 69% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75.99% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 75-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | Your capital is at risk | 65% of retail CFD accounts lose money | 75.78% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider | 
| Demo | IC Markets Demo | Roboforex Demo | eToro Demo | XTB Demo | XM Demo | Pepperstone Demo | AvaTrade Demo | FP Markets Demo | easyMarkets Demo | SpreadEx Demo | FxPro Demo | 
| Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, TR | US, CA, IR | 
You can compare CFD Brokers ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top CFD Brokers for 2025 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top CFD brokers below.
 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	eToro is a multi-asset platform which offers both investing in stocks and cryptoassets, as well as trading CFDs.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
This communication is intended for information and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
Copy Trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
Copy trading is a portfolio management service, provided by eToro (Europe) Ltd., which is authorised and regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission.
Crypto investments are risky and highly volatile. Tax may apply. Understand the risks here.
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.
 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	 
		
	 Losses can exceed deposits
 Losses can exceed deposits