We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading CFD.

As an experienced CFD trader, I’m often asked about the difference between CFDs and ETFs. Over the past few years, including the 2024 AI driven tech rally, the market rotations of 2025 following interest rate adjustments, and the volatility we’ve seen in 2026, I’ve realised how important it is to choose the right instrument for the right strategy.
CFDs are derivative instruments that allow me to speculate on price movements without owning the underlying asset. For example, during the strong Nasdaq rally in 2024, the index moved from roughly 15,000 to above 18,000 within months. Trading index CFDs allowed me to take short term positions and use leverage to amplify gains. In 2025, when inflation data triggered sharp pullbacks of 2 to 3 percent in a single session, I was also able to short the market quickly. However, leverage works both ways. A small adverse move can lead to significant losses if risk is not tightly controlled. That experience reinforced the importance of strict risk management and disciplined position sizing.
In contrast, ETFs are investment funds that track indices or sectors, and when I buy them, I actually own shares in the fund. In early 2026, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has been trading around the $500 to $550 range, reflecting the broader U.S. market’s recovery from prior volatility. The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has traded around the $100 to $120 range, offering diversified global exposure. During market corrections in 2025 and sector rotations in 2026, my ETF holdings declined more gradually compared to the sharp swings I experienced in leveraged CFD trades. The builtin diversification made a noticeable difference in overall portfolio stability.
One clear example came during recent crypto volatility in 2025 and 2026. Bitcoin experienced rapid multi thousand dollar swings within weeks. Trading crypto through CFDs allowed me to react quickly to both upward momentum and sudden drops. Meanwhile, my ETF portfolio remained relatively stable, showing far less day to day volatility. This highlighted how CFDs are useful for shorter term tactical opportunities, while ETFs provide longer term structural exposure.
From my experience across 2024, 2025, and now 2026, choosing between CFDs and ETFs depends on your risk tolerance, time horizon, and emotional discipline. CFDs reward speed and active management. ETFs reward patience and diversification. I personally combine both approaches, using CFDs around major economic events and earnings seasons, while relying on ETFs for longer term wealth building and portfolio balance.

Contracts for Difference (CFDs) are powerful trading instruments that let you speculate on the price movements of assets like Tesla, gold, or even Bitcoin without owning them. From my own experience, when I first traded CFDs on oil in early 2024, I watched prices swing from $72 to over $90 per barrel within weeks. That kind of volatility is exactly what attracts active traders. Fast forward to 2026, and oil has continued to experience sharp moves, recently fluctuating in the $80 to $95 range amid ongoing supply concerns and global demand shifts. The thrill and risk comes from predicting those moves correctly. With CFDs, you can use leverage and margin to amplify both profits and losses, making them inherently high risk. CFD trading is all about direction whether prices rise or fall allowing traders to benefit from volatility in either direction, especially during uncertain economic periods like the 2025 interest rate cycle and continued geopolitical tensions in 2026 affecting commodity markets.
Because of their flexibility, CFDs attract short term traders like myself who enjoy fast paced market action and exposure to a range of assets including stocks, indices, commodities, and forex pairs. For instance, during the Nvidia stock rally in 2025, a well timed CFD trade could have generated over 15 percent profit in a single week. In 2026, Nvidia has continued to trade at elevated levels following AI demand growth, with price swings of 5 to 10 percent occurring around earnings announcements. Those kinds of moves create opportunity, but they also increase risk. I have learned that without solid risk management strategies, losses can accumulate quickly. To maintain discipline, I often revisit CFD Trading Strategies to refine how I structure trades during volatile conditions.
The defining feature of CFD trading is leverage. Under FCA regulation, retail traders can typically use leverage between 1:10 and 1:30 depending on the asset, meaning with just $1,000, you can control up to $30,000 worth of positions. I once used 1:20 leverage on EUR/USD during a major ECB announcement in 2025, when the pair moved nearly 150 pips within hours. In 2026, currency markets have remained active as inflation trends and growth forecasts shift, creating similar high impact trading sessions. Leverage can be a double edged sword. Understanding how it magnifies both gains and losses is essential, which is why I recommend reviewing CFD Leverage carefully before increasing position size.
CFDs can deliver impressive returns, especially during market surges like the 2025 gold rally above $2,400 per ounce. In 2026, gold has continued trading near historically strong levels, recently fluctuating around the $2,300 to $2,500 range as investors respond to inflation expectations and central bank policy signals. While those moves create opportunity, they also highlight the need for control. Personally, pairing measured leverage with strict stop loss orders and a defined risk to reward ratio has significantly improved my consistency. For a clearer view of performance expectations across different volatility cycles, the Average CFD Return page offers helpful perspective.

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) offer a more conservative investment route compared to CFDs. Instead of speculating on price movements, you actually own shares in a fund that tracks an index, sector, or commodity. Personally, I’ve used ETFs like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) to diversify my portfolio. In 2024 and 2025, SPY was trading broadly in the $450 to $520 range, while VWO moved roughly between $38 and $45, reflecting shifts in global growth expectations. Moving into 2026, SPY has traded closer to the $520 to $550 range, while VWO has hovered around the $40 to $48 range, depending on emerging market performance and currency trends. These ETFs trade like regular stocks, allowing me to buy or sell instantly during market hours. Unlike CFDs, ETFs do not typically involve leverage, which significantly reduces the risk of losing more than your initial investment.
ETFs are ideal for long term investors seeking steady growth and diversification. During 2024 to 2025, several AI focused funds such as the Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) delivered strong returns, at one point gaining more than 25 percent annually as enthusiasm around automation and AI infrastructure expanded. In 2026, performance has been more mixed, with periods of volatility as valuations adjusted, but the broader theme of automation and robotics continues to support long term positioning. Holding these ETFs helped me balance the higher volatility of my CFD trades with structural exposure to long term trends.
While ETFs may not deliver the rapid gains that leveraged CFDs sometimes produce, they have provided me with a reliable foundation for building wealth. Their liquidity, diversification, and transparency make them essential in a sustainable strategy. For example, during the 2025 tech correction and subsequent sector rotation into energy and industrial stocks in 2026, my diversified ETF holdings cushioned my portfolio from sharper declines. From my experience, CFDs create short term opportunity, while ETFs provide long term stability. The key is knowing how to balance both effectively.

| Feature | CFDs (Contracts for Difference) | ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | From my own trading experience, CFDs allow you to speculate on price movements of assets like Apple (AAPL), gold, or Bitcoin without owning them. During the 2024–2025 Bitcoin rally, BTC surged above $70,000 and later traded between $60,000 and $75,000 in 2026. I traded BTC/USD CFDs to capture short term swings without buying actual coins. | ETFs are actual investment funds. For instance, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) mirrors the S&P 500 index. After the index moved above 5,000 points in 2025 and continued climbing in 2026 toward the 5,400–5,600 range, my ETF holdings reflected those broader market gains. |
| Ownership | With CFDs, you do not own the underlying asset. When I traded oil CFDs after OPEC production adjustments in 2025 and 2026, I was not buying physical crude. I was speculating on price moves as oil fluctuated between roughly $70 and $95 per barrel. | Owning ETFs gives real exposure. Holding the Vanguard FTSE All World ETF means indirectly owning small portions of thousands of global companies across developed and emerging markets. |
| Leverage | CFDs offer leverage. In the UK, retail traders typically use between 1:10 and 1:30 under FCA regulations. I have used 1:20 leverage trading NASDAQ 100 CFDs, which amplified gains during the 2024 tech rally but also increased losses during 2025 pullbacks. | Most ETFs are unleveraged. Leveraged ETFs such as ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) use 3x exposure. These performed strongly during AI driven rallies but experienced sharp corrections during tech sell offs. |
| Trading Hours | CFDs can be traded nearly 24/5. I monitor gold CFDs overnight, especially during geopolitical tensions. Gold traded above $2,400 per ounce in 2024 and has fluctuated between $2,300 and $2,600 during 2026 volatility. | ETFs trade during market hours. SPY trades during U.S. market hours from 9:30 AM to 4 PM ET, with limited pre market and after hours access depending on the broker. |
| Costs | CFDs involve spreads, commissions, and overnight financing. Holding a GBP/USD CFD overnight can cost approximately 0.01% to 0.03% of position value per day, depending on broker rates and interest differentials. | ETF costs come from expense ratios and brokerage commissions. The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) maintains a very low expense ratio of 0.03%, which I find more cost efficient for long term investing compared to paying CFD overnight fees. |
| Market Exposure | CFDs provide flexible access to global markets. I trade forex pairs like EUR/USD, major indices, stocks such as Tesla, and commodities like silver from one account. | ETFs offer built in diversification. The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) gives exposure to renewable energy companies worldwide without selecting individual stocks. |
| Regulation | CFDs are tightly regulated in many regions. In the UK, the FCA enforces leverage caps and risk disclosures. Retail CFD trading remains prohibited in the United States. | ETFs are regulated under authorities such as the SEC in the U.S. and the FCA in the UK. Funds publish holdings regularly, providing transparency to investors. |
| Risk Level | CFDs carry high risk due to leverage. In 2025, unexpected inflation data caused a 1% market drop that translated into a significantly larger percentage loss on my leveraged position. Strict stop loss discipline is essential. | ETFs carry moderate risk. Losses are limited to the invested capital. During recent market corrections, my diversified ETF holdings declined far less dramatically than leveraged trades. |
| Liquidity | Major CFD instruments like EUR/USD, gold, and indices are highly liquid, though spreads widen during low volume periods such as late Friday trading. | Large ETFs such as SPY trade millions of shares daily, offering deep liquidity and minimal slippage for most investors. |
| Investor Suitability | In my experience, CFDs suit active traders who monitor markets closely and manage leverage carefully. They are useful for short term speculation or hedging. | ETFs are ideal for long term investors. I use them in retirement accounts for steady growth and diversification, especially broad market funds like VOO. |

Although CFDs and ETFs differ in structure and purpose, they share several core trading features that appeal to active investors and portfolio managers. Over the past few years, I’ve traded both instruments especially during volatile periods like the 2024 inflation spikes, the 2025 tech rebound, and the continued sector rotations we’ve seen in 2026. In many situations, they respond to market forces in very similar ways.
Both CFDs and certain ETFs allow traders to use leverage, meaning they can control a larger position than their initial capital. In early 2025, I traded Nasdaq 100 CFDs using 1:20 leverage. When the index moved just 2 percent, the impact on my position felt amplified. Leveraged ETFs such as ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and SPXL aim to multiply daily index returns. In 2024, when the Nasdaq rallied sharply, TQQQ delivered outsized gains. In 2026, however, during choppier markets, daily compounding made returns far less predictable. In both CFDs and leveraged ETFs, profits can grow quickly but so can losses, making risk control essential.

Both instruments provide exposure to multiple asset classes. I’ve used CFDs to trade gold when it surged above $2,400 per ounce in 2024, and again during renewed strength near similar levels in 2026. I also traded Bitcoin CFDs when prices moved from roughly $40,000 in 2024 toward the $60,000 to $70,000 range in 2025 and 2026. ETFs offer comparable diversification. For example, the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) provide exposure to specific regions and sectors. While ETFs are ideal for structured exposure, CFDs often provide faster and more flexible speculative access.
Both CFDs and ETFs involve spreads, which widen during volatility. Around the 2025 Federal Reserve rate decisions, I saw spreads on major CFD indices such as US30 expand noticeably. ETFs also reflect wider bid ask differences during fast market moves. In addition, CFDs may include overnight financing fees, while ETFs carry annual management fees, often between 0.05 percent and 0.5 percent. In 2026’s more volatile sessions, I’ve noticed that liquidity remains strong in major instruments, but costs still increase during major economic releases.
Both instruments can be used for hedging. When technology stocks corrected in late 2024, I hedged my position in the Invesco QQQ ETF by shorting a Nasdaq 100 CFD. In 2026, during renewed uncertainty around growth expectations, I again used short CFD positions to offset temporary weakness in my long term ETF holdings. Some investors instead use inverse ETFs like SH or SPXS to protect portfolios. CFDs offer quicker execution for short term hedging, while ETFs provide structured exposure for longer periods.
Liquidity remains strong in both markets. ETFs such as SPY and VOO continue to trade millions of shares daily, both in 2024 and in 2026. Major CFD instruments linked to indices, Apple, Tesla, and commodities also maintain tight pricing under normal conditions. During the 2025 earnings season and again in early 2026, I found that CFD positions reacted instantly to breaking company news, while ETFs moved more gradually due to their diversified structure. In both cases, high liquidity improves execution speed and reduces slippage.
Neither CFDs nor ETFs have a fixed expiration date, unlike futures contracts. I’ve held CFDs for hours during short term trades and ETFs like VTI for years as a core investment. This flexibility allows both day traders and long term investors to align their strategies with their goals and risk tolerance.


CFDs generally carry a higher risk profile due to leverage. I’ve seen accounts double during high volatility and I’ve also seen positions wiped out overnight when oil or crypto prices moved against traders. Because CFDs allow trading on margin, market swings can turn profits into losses quickly, even resulting in losing more than your initial capital. Using stop loss orders and demo accounts is crucial for survival.
ETFs, by contrast, offer lower risk exposure thanks to diversification. When I held the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) through 2024’s inflation uncertainty, its diversified nature smoothed out the volatility that individual stocks experienced. ETFs are better suited for investors seeking long term stability over daily speculation.
Understanding costs is essential when comparing CFDs and ETFs. CFD trading often includes spreads, overnight financing, and sometimes commissions depending on the broker. For instance, trading CFDs on indices like the US500 can cost around 0.5 pips spread plus overnight swap fees if held after market close. You can compare different CFD fees here.
ETFs generally have lower management fees and no overnight financing. For example, the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) charges just 0.07% annually. However, you still pay brokerage commissions when buying or selling, which vary depending on your trading platform. I’ve used commission free brokers like Fidelity and Webull to minimize these costs.
Tax implications differ between CFDs and ETFs. CFD traders may face capital gains or income tax depending on their jurisdiction. For instance, in the UK, CFD profits can be subject to capital gains tax but are exempt from stamp duty details can be found at CFD Tax UK. ETFs, on the other hand, are treated as equity investments, meaning capital gains and dividends are taxed similarly to stock holdings. In my case, holding ETFs long term has been more tax efficient.

Tax implications differ between CFDs and ETFs. CFD traders may face capital gains or income tax depending on their jurisdiction. For instance, in the UK, CFD profits can be subject to capital gains tax but are exempt from stamp duty details can be found at CFD Tax UK. ETFs, on the other hand, are treated as equity investments, meaning capital gains and dividends are taxed similarly to stock holdings. In my case, holding ETFs long term has been more tax efficient.

One of the biggest advantages of CFD trading is leverage. When I traded gold CFDs in early 2025 as prices hovered around $2,350 per ounce, I could open large positions with minimal capital, amplifying both potential returns and risks. In 2026, as gold pushed above $2,500 per ounce during renewed inflation concerns and geopolitical tensions, those leveraged positions became even more powerful. CFDs also offer flexibility to trade multiple asset classes from forex and commodities to indices all within a single trading app.
Unlike CFDs, ETFs do not use leverage by default, so movements are proportional and easier to manage emotionally. During the market rotations of 2025 and the sector shifts seen in 2026, this lower volatility has made ETFs a more predictable and stress controlled component of my long term portfolio.

Both CFD and ETF trading have become integral components of modern financial portfolios. Over the years, these instruments have gained immense popularity among both retail and institutional traders, offering diverse opportunities to profit from global markets. Brokerages worldwide continue to expand their offerings of CFDs and ETFs, attracting new traders with benefits like low commissions, tight spreads, and flexible trading conditions.
Among the two, index CFDs and index ETFs tend to dominate trading volumes due to their relatively lower volatility and the broad exposure they provide. This makes them appealing to both active traders and long term investors seeking diversified market participation.
In this comparison between CFDs and ETFs, we explored their respective advantages, costs, tax implications, and risk factors. While both instruments can be profitable, it's essential to remember that no financial product guarantees returns. As a trader, I believe that success in either market depends heavily on knowledge, discipline, and risk management. Understanding how leverage works in CFD trading or how diversification benefits ETFs can make a crucial difference in performance.
The choice between CFDs and ETFs depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and trading style. CFDs may suit traders looking for short term opportunities and who are comfortable managing leveraged risk. On the other hand, ETFs may appeal to investors seeking long term stability and lower exposure to market swings. For those who want to explore CFDs in more detail, including the most reliable platforms and regulated brokers, you can visit CFD Brokers and CFD Platforms for further guidance.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Cfd Vs Etf to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Cfd Vs Etf. Below we shortlist what we think are the best CFD brokers after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Cfd Vs Etf.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online CFD trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade CFD more confidently.
Selecting the right online CFD trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for CFD trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our CFD brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a CFD broker that best suits your needs and preferences for CFD. Our CFD broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top CFD Brokers.
Compare CFD brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a CFD broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your CFD needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are CFD brokers. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more CFD brokers that accept CFD clients.
| Broker |
IC Markets
|
Roboforex
|
eToro
|
XTB
|
XM
|
Pepperstone
|
AvaTrade
|
FP Markets
|
EasyMarkets
|
SpreadEx
|
FXPro
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | |||||||||||
| Regulation | International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (Australia) (ASIC) Australian Securities & Investments Commission Licence No. 335692, Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) (SD018), IC Markets (EU) Ltd (CySEC) Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission with License No. 362/18, Capital Markets Authority(CMA) Kenya IC Markets (KE) Ltd, Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) IC Markets (Bahamas) Ltd | RoboForex Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Belize under licence No. 000138/32, under the Securities Industry Act 2021, RoboForex Ltd is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also RoboForex Ltd is a participant of the Financial Commission Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) eToro (UK) Ltd (FCA reference 583263), eToro (Europe) Ltd CySEC (Cyprus Securities Exchange Commission), ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076, eToro (ME) Limited (ADGM) Abu Dhabi (UAE) number 220073, eToro (Europe) Ltd (AMF) Autorité des marchés financiers as a digital assets provider France | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157) XTB Limited, CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority XTB MENA Limited licensed 8 July 2021), FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles license number SD148), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority XTB Africa (Pty) Ltd licensed 10 August 2021), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego Polish Financial Supervision Authority) | Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) (49976) XM ZA (Pty) Ltd, Financial Services Commission (FSC) (000261/27) XM Global Limited, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (license 120/10) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) (number 443670) Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Ava Capital Markets Australia Pty Ltd (406684), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) Ava Capital Markets Pty Ltd (45984), Financial Services Agency (Japan FSA) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1662), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ) Ava Trade Japan K.K. (1574), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) / Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA) Ava Trade Middle East Ltd (190018), Central Bank of Ireland (C53877) AVA Trade EU Ltd, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) AVA Trade EU Ltd (branch authorisation), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) Ava Trade Markets Ltd (SIBA/L/13/1049), Israel Securities Authority (ISA) ATrade Ltd (514666577), Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC 0261 of 2024), Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada through Friedberg Direct (IIROC) | CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (371/18), ASIC AFS (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) (286354), FSP (Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa) (50926), Financial Services Authority Seychelles (FSA) (SD 130) | Easy Forex Trading Ltd is regulated by CySEC (License 079/07). This is the only entity that onboards EU clients. easyMarkets Pty Ltd is regulated by ASIC (AFS License 246566), EF Worldwide Ltd (Seychelles) is regulated by FSA (License SD056), EF Worldwide Ltd (British Virgin Islands) is regulated by FSC (License SIBA/L/20/1135), EF Worldwide (PTY) Ltd is regulated by FSCA (License 54018) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (190941), Gambling Commission (Great Britain) (8835), licence in Ireland as remote bookmaker for fixed odds betting licence number 1016176 | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) (509956), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) (078/07), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) (45052), SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) (SIA-F184), FSA (Financial Services Authority of Seychelles) (SD120) |
| Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | No minimum deposit | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 100 | 25 | No minimum deposit | 100 |
| Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Used By | 200,000+ | 730,000+ | 40,000,000+ | 2,000,000+ | 15,000,000+ | 830,000+ | 400,000+ | 200,000+ | 250,000+ | 60,000+ | 11,200,000+ |
| Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Platforms | MT5, MT4, MetaTrader WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), MetaTrader iPhone/iPad, MetaTrader Android Google Play, MetaTrader Mac, cTrader, cTrader Web, cTrader iPhone/iPad, cTrader iMac, cTrader Android Google Play, cTrader Automate, cTrader Copy Trading, TradingView, Virtual Private Server, Trading Servers, MT4 Advanced Trading Tools, IC Insights, Trading Central | MT4, MT5, R Mobile Trader, R StocksTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Windows | eToro Trading App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), CopyTrading, Web | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT5, MT5 WebTrader, XM Apple App for iPhone, XM App for Android Google Play, Tablet: MT5 for iPad, MT5 for Android Google Play, XM App for iPad, XM App for iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Mobile Apps | MT4, MT5, cTrader,WebTrader, TradingView, Windows, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, Web Trading, AvaTrade App, AvaOptions, Mac Trading, AvaSocial, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader, WebTrader, Mobile Trader, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) | easyMarkets App, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), Web Platform, TradingView, MT4, MT5 | Web, Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play), iPad App, iPhone App, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro WebTrader, FxPro Mobile Apps, iOS (App Store), Android (Google Play) |
| Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with etoro |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Sign
Up with fxpro |
| Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 50% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 70% - 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.48% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 72-95 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | 57% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | Losses can exceed deposits | 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | 62% of retail CFD accounts lose money | 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs and Spread Betting with this provider |
| Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
eToro Demo |
XTB Demo |
XM Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
FxPro Demo |
| Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, MG, MK, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, AX, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, MO, UA, JO, KR, AO, BR, HR, GL, IS, IM, JM, FM, MC, NG, SI, | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | US, CA, IL, IR | AF, AS, AQ, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | US, JP, NZ | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, TR | US, CA, IR |
You can compare CFD Brokers ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top CFD Brokers for 2026 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top CFD brokers below.
eToro is a multi-asset platform which offers both investing in stocks and cryptoassets, as well as trading CFDs.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 50% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
This communication is intended for information and educational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or investment recommendation. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
Copy Trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.
Crypto investments are risky and may not suit retail investors; you could lose your entire investment. Understand the risks here.
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.
Losses can exceed deposits