We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading Investment Platforms.
Traders should consider whether to invest in a lump sum or bit by bit. The option chosen differs between investors, but let's find out what the analysts have to say. In this article, titled 'Pound Cost Averaging Vs Lump Sum Investing', we will discuss in detail the two terms and why one might be a better option than the other.
Investing in a lump sum is not possible for everyone. Some are lucky enough to have a large sum to invest, which may have emerged from a sale of assets such as a house or a business, investment schemes, or mature savings. It can also be an inheritance, lottery winnings, or severance package.
When a large sum is generated from any of such sources, one is often left with the dilemma as to whether they should invest that money as a whole or in instalments over time. Many prefer spreading out investments rather than buying assets a single price. This step is called pound-cost averaging and is a popular investment strategy.
The concept of pound-cost averaging provides protection against the possibility of a sharp drop in market prices immediately after making an investment. The protection does not cover 100 percent of an asset, though. Moreover, it is never wise to purchase at the top of the market, even if accidentally.
It can be said that investing a portion of the large sum can save one from suffering higher loss. The remaining portion can be invested at lower prices, meaning the pound-cost averaging strategy is likely to work better in a falling market.
However, with pound-cost averaging, a significant problem is often encountered. The market tends to go up more than it goes down. History tells us that in a period of the past three decades the market has risen more than six times in every 10 months.
There is one more significant drawback. The asset allocation of one's portfolio is altered until the entire amount is invested under the strategy of pound-cost averaging. The extra cash here will skew up the investment mix from the original and according to the goals originally set.
Suppose an investor receives a large sum of money that is the same in value as their existing holdings. Now, if the initial portfolio was segregated as 40 percent bonds and 60 percent stocks, the new portfolio would be invested as 50 percent cash, 20 percent bonds, and 30 percent stocks.
However, this is a different allocation and aligning with the previously set goals would be difficult as earnings from cash are meagre, dragging on the overall return. With a pound-cost average strategy, the cash drag can be persistent for a significant amount of time and it may affect the chances of reaching one's investment goals.
Moreover, if the cash is not completely invested, its drag can persist for a very long time, perhaps indefinitely. It will thereafter result in lower returns permanently.
Is it true that the pound-cost averaging strategy lacks value? This is not true as insurance is provided against regret. Investors generally do not like investing a significant sum to see an immediate market drop afterwards. Some fear regret and believe waiting is the right policy until more confidence is gained.
However, the right time may not come in a very long time and hence pound-cost averaging can help in overcoming the fear factor associated with such a situation.
Such hedging against regret has a cost and most of the time lower returns are seen. If one fears a market downturn, it is better to consider using a pound-cost averaging method in order to get insurance against regret.
The income from an investment as well as the value of it may rise or fall over time. Moreover, the past performance of the investment may not be reliable sometimes for future results.
In this article, titled 'Pound Cost Averaging Vs Lump Sum Investing', we have discussed both pound-cost averaging and large sum investing. We have explained what the pros and cons of each are, and before wrapping up, it is important to note that the preference of using one or the other relies heavily on the investor choosing. The two are based on preferred strategies. If an investor fears that the market may drop significantly after making an investment, they can opt for pound-cost averaging.
However, most investors believe in the strategy of pound-cost averaging as the risk level associated with it is low.
We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Pound Cost Averaging Vs Lump Sum Investing to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Pound Cost Averaging Vs Lump Sum Investing. Below we shortlist what we think are the best Investment Platforms after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Pound Cost Averaging Vs Lump Sum Investing.
Selecting a reliable and reputable online Investment Platforms trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade Investment Platforms more confidently.
Selecting the right online Investment Platforms trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:
Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.
When choosing a broker for Investment Platforms trading, it's essential to compare the different options available to you. Our Investment Platforms brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.
By comparing these essential features, you can choose a Investment Platforms broker that best suits your needs and preferences for Investment Platforms. Our Investment Platforms broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.
Here are the top Investment Platforms.
Compare Investment Platforms brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a Investment Platforms broker, it's crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your Investment Platforms needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.
All brokers below are Investment Platforms. Learn more about what they offer below.
You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more Investment Platforms that accept Investment Platforms clients.
Broker |
IC Markets
![]() |
Roboforex
![]() |
eToro
![]() |
XM
![]() |
XTB
![]() |
AvaTrade
![]() |
Pepperstone
![]() |
Trading212
![]() |
FP Markets
![]() |
EasyMarkets
![]() |
SpreadEx
![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | |||||||||||
Regulation | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) | RoboForex Ltd is regulated by the FSC, license 000138/437, reg. number 128.572. RoboForex Ltd, which is an (A category) member of The Financial Commission, also is a participant of its Compensation Fund | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) Etoro (Europe) Limited FCA reference 523775, eToro (UK) Ltd FCA reference 583263, ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) eToro AUS Capital Limited ASIC license 491139, CySec (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission under the license 109/10), MiFID (Markets In Financial Instruments Directive), FSAS (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) eToro (Seychelles) Ltd license SD076 | Financial Services Commission (FSC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) | FCA (Financial Conduct Authority reference 522157), CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission reference 169/12), FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority), XTB AFRICA (PTY) LTD licensed to operate in South Africa, KPWiG (Polish Securities and Exchange Commission), DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority), DIFC (Dubai International Financial Center), CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores), KNF (Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego), IFSC (Belize International Financial Services Commission license number IFSC/60/413/TS/19) | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), ASIC (406684), Financial Services Authority (FSA), South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), Financial Stability Board (FSB), The Financial Services Agency (JAPAN FSA), Financial Futures Association of Japan (FFAJ), Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM), Financial Regulatory Services Authority (FRSA), Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), Israel Securities Association (ISA), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI), BVI (SIBA/L/13/1049), Central Bank of Ireland | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya (CMA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of the Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F217 | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Firm reference number 609146, Financial Supervision Commission (FSC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySec) License number 398/21 | Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), FSCA (FSP Number 50926) | Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission (BVI) | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) |
Min Deposit | 200 | 10 | 50 | 5 | No minimum deposit | 100 | 200 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used By | 180,000+ | 1,000,000+ | 30,000,000+ | 3,500,000+ | 581,000+ | 300,000+ | 400,000+ | 15,000,000+ | 10,000+ | 142,500+ | 10,000+ |
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platforms | MT4, MT5, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, cTrader, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android | MT4, MT5, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | MT4, MT5, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | MT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | Web Trader, MT4, MT5, AvaTradeGo, AvaOptions, DupliTrade, ZuluTrade, Mobile Apps, ZuluTrade, DupliTrade, MQL5 | MT4, MT5, TradingView, DupliTrade, myFXbook, Mac, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps | Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | MT4, MT5, IRESS, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | MT4, MT5, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn More |
Sign
Up with icmarkets |
Sign
Up with roboforex |
Sign
Up with etoro |
Sign
Up with xm |
Sign
Up with xtb |
Sign
Up with avatrade |
Sign
Up with pepperstone |
Sign
Up with trading212 |
Sign
Up with fpmarkets |
Sign
Up with easymarkets |
Sign
Up with spreadex |
Risk Warning | Losses can exceed deposits | Losses can exceed deposits | 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75.33% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 81% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | 71% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider | 74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs | CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 79% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. | Losses can exceed deposits | Your capital is at risk | Losses can exceed deposits |
Demo |
IC Markets Demo |
Roboforex Demo |
eToro Demo |
XM Demo |
XTB Demo |
AvaTrade Demo |
Pepperstone Demo |
Trading 212 Demo |
FP Markets Demo |
easyMarkets Demo |
SpreadEx Demo |
Excluded Countries | US, IR, CA, NZ, JP | AU, BE, BQ, BR, CA, CW, CZ, DE, ES, EE, EU, FM, FR, FI, GW, ID, IR, JP, LR, MP, NL, PF, PL, RU, SE, SJ, SS, SL, SI, TL, TR, DO, US, IT, AT, PT, BG, HR, CY, DK, FL, GR, IE, LV, LT, MT, RO, SK, CH | ZA, ID, IR, KP, BE, CA, JP, SY, TR, IL, BY, AL, MD, MK, RS, GN, CD, SD, SA, ZW, ET, GH, TZ, LY, UG, ZM, BW, RW, TN, SO, NA, TG, SL, LR, GM, DJ, CI, PK, BN, TW, WS, NP, SG, VI, TM, TJ, UZ, LK, TT, HT, MM, BT, MH, MV, KZ, GD, FJ, PT, BB, BM, BS, AG, AI, AW, LB, SV, PY, HN, GT, PR, NI, VG, AN, CN, BZ, DZ, MY, KH, PH, VN, EG, MN, UA, JO, KR, | US, CA, IL, KR, IR, MM, CU, SD, SY | US, IN, PK, BD, NG , ID, BE, AU | BE, BR, KP, NZ, TR, US, CA, SG | AF, AS, AQ, AR, AM, AZ, BY, BE, BZ, BT, BA, BI, CM, CA, CF, TD, CG, CI, ER, GF, PF, GP, GU, GN, GW, GY, HT, VA, IR, IQ, JP, KZ, LB, LR, LY, ML, MQ, YT, MZ, MM, NZ, NI, KP, PS, PR, RE, KN, LC, VC, WS, SO, GS, KR, SS, SD, SR, SY, TJ, TN, TM, TC, US, UY, VU, VG, EH, ES, YE, ZW, ET | US, CA | US, JP, NZ | US, IL, BC, MB, QC, ON, AF, BY, BI, KH, KY, TD, KM, CG, CU, CD, GQ, ER, FJ, GN, GW, HT, IR, IQ, LA, LY, MZ, MM, NI, KP, PW, PA, RU, SO, SS, SD, SY, TT, TM, VU, VE, YE | US, TR |
You can compare Investment Platforms ratings, min deposits what the the broker offers, funding methods, platforms, spread types, customer support options, regulation and account types side by side.
We also have an indepth Top Investment Platforms for 2023 article further below. You can see it now by clicking here
We have listed top Investment Platforms below.
eToro is a multi-asset platform which offers both investing in stocks and cryptoassets, as well as trading CFDs.
Please note that CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Past performance is not an indication of future results. Trading history presented is less than 5 complete years and may not suffice as basis for investment decision.
Copy trading is a portfolio management service, provided by eToro (Europe) Ltd., which is authorised and regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission.
Cryptoasset investing is highly volatile and unregulated in some EU countries. No consumer protection. Tax on profits may apply.
eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication, which has been prepared by our partner utilizing publicly available non-entity specific information about eToro.